Talk:George Romanes

Physiology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to the field of physiology.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

History of Science Low‑importance

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

The text is about "coined the term" (probably "neo-Darwinism") hence this article should be split into a bio and the coined term.

No, disagree. The article is about much more than the coining of a term. But if the article gets longer, a separation into 'Life' and 'Work' would follow naturally. Macdonald-ross (talk) 17:58, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Romanes and Religion

It is actually doubtful whether Romanes eventually embraced Christianity again. His posthumous papers are not entirely clear on the matter. Historiographical sources other than McGrew's may be referred to. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Movinwes (talk • contribs) 14:45, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article as presently worded contradicts itself on the question whether Romanes returned to Christianity at the end of his life. 68.3.215.199 (talk) 16:56, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on George Romanes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140508025810/http://historicalapologetics.org/a-pilgrim%E2%80%99s-regress-george-john-romanes-and-the-search-for-rational-faith/ to http://historicalapologetics.org/a-pilgrim%E2%80%99s-regress-george-john-romanes-and-the-search-for-rational-faith/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:05, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

His positions

The text is inconsistent in telling us what professional positions he held, when. In the Accomplishments section it mentioned that he was a Professor at the University of Edinburgh. Professor of what? Then it mentions that he established a lecture series later, when he was a Professor at Cambridge University. It never actually mentions his becoming that. And again, Professor of what? Music? I think that he deserves better than this. Felsenst (talk) 21:50, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mention of Romanes in Forbes article

I came across a few paragraphs mentioning Romanes & Neo-Darwinism in an article portraying Denis Noble:

Morris, Andréa (2024-06-14). "Evolution May Be Purposeful And It's Freaking Scientists Out". Forbes. Retrieved 2024-06-15.

It seems that Nobel discusses Romanes in multiple publications:

"Denis+Noble"+"George+Romanes ""Denis Noble" "George Romanes" search". Google Scholar. Retrieved 2024-06-15.

A Google search on the both of them returns almost three dozen results:

""Denis Noble" "George Romanes"". Google Search. 2024-06-14. Retrieved 2024-06-15.

I am busy with other editing matters & this is the first that I have heard of Romanes, so I am hoping that someone more familiar with him might look at these newer citations & determine what could be useful for the article. Peaceray (talk) 19:58, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]