Talk:George N. Parks

George N. Parks has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 19, 2015. (Reviewed version).

Biography: Musicians / Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Marching band High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marching band, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marching bands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marching bandWikipedia:WikiProject Marching bandTemplate:WikiProject Marching bandMarching band
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Delaware / Massachusetts / University of Massachusetts Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Delaware portal This article is supported by WikiProject Delaware (assessed as Low-importance).
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts - University of Massachusetts (assessed as Mid-importance).

New York (state): Western NY

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state)
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western New York (assessed as Low-importance).

Chicago

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Very cute about the vampire thing, but let's try to adhere to the Wikipedia standards

-- Scott Frazer -- 14:45, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's hilarious how George National Parks gets re-directed to here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Symonds1990 (talk • contribs) 17:38, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

George Parks' Passing

Article does not say how he died. Struck that from entry. B.K. (talk) 12:42, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral point of view, unsourced content and Wikipedia is not a memorial

I edited portions of this article today to comply with basic Wikipedia guidelines, including:

WP:NOTMEMORIAL Wikipedia is not a memorial site. While Parks clearly meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines, content extolling his ability to charm a crowd is not encyclopedic and does not fit in a Wikipedia article.
Wikipedia:Neutral point of view This is a central tenet of Wikipedia.
Wikipedia:Verifiability Another core principle of Wikipedia.

Questions or other proposed changes can be discussed here. --Crunch (talk) 00:53, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:George N. Parks/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 3family6 (talk · contribs) 03:20, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
Earwig's tool brought up a violation of this website, where a whole paragraph is identical. However, I'm having trouble distinguishing which was first, the Wikipedia statement, or the website. The Wikipedia edit adding the information was done on November 1, 2010, while the blog post is dated December 12, 2010. However, the blog post seems to be a re-posting of an older news item, which is dated to October 16, 2010. So a violation appears highly probable here.

There was a second violation as well, this one for certain. There is a paragraph in "Death and legacy" that is lifted verbatim from a Falls News Press article. The quote part is fine, but the wording surrounding the quote is identical on both Wikipedia and the original source. In this case, the violation is clear, since the news article predates the Wikipedia content by months if not years (I didn't look for exactly when the content was added to Wikipedia).

These violations must be fixed immediately, or else I will have to quickfail this review.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 21:23, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Although I cannot see the first issue, I am going to take your word for it and wait until the bot works again so that I don't have to purge the entire text. The second issue was probably added in around that time by someone else, as I have not really added much prose to the article. Regardless, I have gone ahead and reworded it, so I hope that helps! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 22:27, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Looks better now. The majority of the paragraph is a quote, so that is acceptable. I'll get on the rest of this article after dinner.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 22:32, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

" The annual alumni band made up of previous band members who have since graduated from UMass, returned to participate in the event, which was the largest the university had ever seen, with approximately 1,300 participants.[17][18]" - needs a comma after "alumni band."--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 01:23, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Follows MOS.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 01:25, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:
Reference section provided, and citations follow a consistent format.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 01:23, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

B. Citations to reliable sources, where necessary:
http://umassalumni.com/awards/profiles/past.html and http://www.umass.edu/newsoffice/newsreleases/articles/111065.php, http://www.umass.edu/umhome/parks/, http://sbomagazine.com/ME2/dirmod.asp?sid=&nm=&type=news&mod=News&mid=9A02E3B96F2A415ABC72CB5F516B4C10&tier=3&nid=B7E3DC58EE1A460F819A3C9962CB9FF7, http://www.ohio.com/news/103183359.html, and http://www.google.com/trends/hottrends?sa=X&date=2010-9-17 are dead links.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 01:23, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All is referenced, and adequate citations are provided.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 01:23, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

C. No original research:
All content is verfiable.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 01:23, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:
All major aspects of Parks' life are addressed.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 01:23, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

B. Focused:
Stay focused on Parks.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 01:23, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Neutral in tone and representation of the subject.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 01:23, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
No edit warring or other disruptions.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 01:23, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
Both images are released under Creative Commons.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 01:23, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Images are useful, with suitable captions.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 01:23, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Overall: Some dead links, and the one possible copyvio is still outstanding.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 01:23, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ktr101, how are things going on this?--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 18:49, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
My apologies, as I have been busy the past couple of days. I will try to get it all done by the weekend, as I have some free time by then. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 20:33, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@3family6: I have gone ahead and fixed the link issue, although I have no way to verify the first issue and correct it, due to the tool being down. If it is still working for you, let me know, as I would be happy to work off a screenshot. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 00:17, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Ktr101: My bad - the link I gave was bad. I corrected the link, it should work now.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 03:19, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@3family6: I have gone ahead and cleaned it up as much as possible, so let me know if you need anything else. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 20:10, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pass or Fail:
All issues resolved. Passed.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 15:33, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on George N. Parks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://umassalumni.com/awards/profiles/past.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:54, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on George N. Parks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:57, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on George N. Parks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140916135330/http://alumni.umassband.com/people/2010/09/obituary/ to http://alumni.umassband.com/people/2010/09/obituary/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:41, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]