Talk:Geometric design of roads

This article was nominated for deletion on 9 April 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

Highways Mid‑importance

	Roads portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Highways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of highways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HighwaysWikipedia:WikiProject HighwaysTemplate:WikiProject HighwaysHighways
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Civil engineering Mid‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCivil engineering
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Units of measure

A large number of formulae in this artcile have hard-coded numbers, but there is no mention of units of measure. For example, the camber of a curved section of road is designed by equating centrifugal force and a component of gravitational force:

m.v²/r = m.g.sin(θ)

If the units are from a consistent set of units (eg speed in m/s, r in metres, g in m/s² or speed in ft/s, r in ft and g in ft/s²), then the equation is universal. As soon non-consistent units are introduced (eg mph or km/h), constants need ot be introduced into the equations to account for changes of units - these constants are unit-specific - an engineer working in mph will use different constants to an engineer working in km/h. The editors of the article do not have appreciated this. Furthermore, in this particular article, European stnadrds might be different to US standards (and might well differ from country to country). Martinvl (talk) 16:26, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm working on an upgrade of this page. I could use some help with road guidelines and standards other than AASHTO.

Also, I propose moving much of the math to a separate page, and keeping this article as a general introduction to the topic. Any opinions?--Triskele Jim (talk) 01:47, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete

How about a section on the safety effects of highway geometry?--Triskele Jim (talk) 01:18, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've started a draft section on this in my sandbox. Helpful comments and suggestions are welcome.--Triskele Jim (talk) 18:13, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to curvature, cross section and other subjects should be added.--'Triskele Jim (talk) 16:28, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Geometric design of roads. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100531182754/http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d11/vc22358_5.htm to http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d11/vc22358_5.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:24, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]