This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
:AE Housman, believe it or not, was a great admirer, and I think he claimed to have popularised this book in Britain. I'll try to find the references for this. Seadowns (talk) 22:40, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I removed the claim that the comic strip was created in response to the success of the play, as we had the strip debuting in April, 2026 and sources I added indicated that the play was first performed April 28, 2026, and thus there was no time to launch a strip after the play went up.
However, I suspect that the dates given in the Holz reference for the strip are wrong. Doing research in newspaper archives show that the strip first appeared in several papers on June 7, and while I do not have access at the moment to the Evening World (apparently its home paper), I can see that the World ran ads in another paper on June 7 stating that the strip would be appearing in their paper. So it seems likely to me that the strip first appeared on that date, in which case the pre-Broadway success of the play could possibly have influenced the creation of the strip. However, that claim also apparently comes from Holz (I do not have a copy of that source to verify what it says), and his guide has a reputation of being "pretty good" -- there are errors, but the book is a net benefit.
I am pulling away from making direct edits, as after the research I find I'm being pulled in a direction that would create a conflict of interest for me. However, I may be able to provide a citable source in the coming months. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 14:50, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Whatever Holtz's previous reference had, his website now lists June 7 as the start of the strip. I recommend that someone review that material and update the coverage of the strip as appropriate. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 07:54, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am requesting that in the Adaptations section, the text
Loos licensed her novel for use in a daily newspaper comic strip series that ran from April 1926 to September 1926.[1] The comic strip was not an adaptation of the novel but placed its characters in new comedic situations. Although the writing was credited to Loos, it was presumably ghost-written by the artists, Virginia Huget and Phil Cook.[2] This original 1926 series was reprinted in newspapers from 1929 to the early 1930s.[2]
...be replaced by...
Excerpt from the July 20, 1926 installment of the comic strip, drawn by Virginia Huget.Loos licensed her novel to the Bell Syndicate for use in a daily newspaper comic strip series that ran from July to October, 1926. The comic strip mixed adaptations of moments from the novel with new gags featuring the characters. The strip was credited to Loos, with art supplied first by Virginia Huget (the start of her career drawing flapper comics) and later by Phil Cook.[3] This original 1926 series was reprinted in newspapers from 1929 to the early 1930s.[2]
This change is necessary because the existing text includes both some erroneous dates and some assumptions based on erroneous information (Holz assumes that Loos could not have written the strip because she was writing the show that reached Broadway in the fall… but as per our article on Loos, the script for the Broadway show was finished before the show opened out of town in April) as well as some strange assumptions (that Loos could not have been writing two things at once; that if she did not do the writing, it was probably the artists writing it – Huget would go on to use a ghostwriter on her own daily strip.) The Holz material is a self-published source. I am instead citing the recently released first-ever collection of this strip.
I am not adding this material myself both because I am self-citing (I am the writer of the back-of-the-book notes I am citing) and because I have a conflict of interest in regards to this strip (as the publisher of the book, I stand to profit from the strip.) While the notes I am citing do qualify as a self-published source, I believe I qualify as “an established subject-matter expert, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable, independent publications” as called for at WP:SPS, as I won an Eisner Award in 2023 for my writing on comic strip history, and my writing on comics history has been published by the Charles M. Schulz Museum, Hogan’s Alley magazine, and American Heritage magazine, among others. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 02:05, 14 December 2024 (UTC) Nat Gertler (talk) 02:05, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@NatGertler: I'm not sure if I'm doing this correctly, but I have implemented the changes you requested as your logic appears to be sound in terms of the corrections, and Holtz 2011 does make several unwarranted assumptions. Thank you for pointing out those errors, as well as uploading the comic strip panel. I'm glad to encounter another Wikipedia editor who enjoys the works of Anita Loos. — Flask⚗️(talk)03:45, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@NatGertler: After browsing The Cincinnati Enquirer in the Newspapers.com archive, I located the original comic strip announcement as well as the panels which we can directly cite instead of self-published sources. Accordingly, I have replaced the self-published sources with the Enquirer citations.
The Cincinnati Enquirer citations show that: 1.) the comic strip ran from June 21 until October with the Bell Syndicate imprint and with first Virginia Huget and then Phil Cook as illustrators, 2.) per the announcement advertisement, the strip featured the characters and situations from the book, and 3.) that the strip was credited to Loos as the panels show "By Anita Loos" in the top corner.
Again, as The Cincinnati Enquirer is a reputable source, citing it directly should avoid issues with citing self-published sources as well as avoid the conflict of interest issue. Let me know your thoughts. — Flask⚗️(talk)05:31, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are several problems with that. The Enquirer is not announcing the day that the strip is starting syndication; instead, it is announcing the day that it started appearing in that particular paper, so we can't use it as proof of the start date... and indeed it was not. In fact, my statement of July was a transcription error (sorry), I meant June, and here is a clipping of it showing up on June 7, the actual first date. Also, the paper source does not say that the strip ends in October, you have merely pointed to the final example in that paper. That it was not in that paper the next day does not show that the syndicate had stopped putting it out (they had, but any one paper is not proof of that; papers cancel still-running strips all the time.) And none of the sources note that this was the start of Huget's career drawing flapper comics.
The conflict of interest issue is only a conflict if I put the edit in; this is precisely the sort of thing that a COI edit request is for, allowing someone else to ensure the material is due for inclusion.
(I should note that I also should have created a second reference placement for the dates. That the strip ran June 7 to Oct 2 is not mentioned in the back matter that I cited for the rest of the information; it appears on page 2 of the book.) -- Nat Gertler (talk) 06:11, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
After combing Newspapers.com, Archive.org and Google Books for several hours, I have re-added the self-published sources as it appears those are the only sources for the cited information regarding the strip's publication length and reprints. I did find a 1926 newspaper article that mentions Huget's skill at depicting the latest fashions, so I added that tidbit to the text. — Flask⚗️(talk)10:15, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I can see that the effort was put in!
At some point, I'll have to do the work to make Phil Cook's name wikilinkable. He was not one of the several gentlemen with that name who currently have Wikipedia pages, but he was notable... not particularly for his brief art career, a bit more for his prior career as a lyricist for three shows that reached Broadway, but mostly for his post art career, his one-man comedy radio show on NBC (Phil Cook -- The Quaker Man). -- Nat Gertler (talk) 17:38, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
^Holtz 2011 sfnm error: no target: CITEREFHoltz2011 (help); Loos 1949 sfnm error: no target: CITEREFLoos1949 (help).
^ abcHoltz 2011. sfn error: no target: CITEREFHoltz2011 (help)Cite error: The named reference "FOOTNOTEHoltz2011" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
^Loos, Anita (2024). Gentlemen Prefer Blondes: the Comic Strip. Camarillo, California, US: About Comics. pp. 57–63.
.jpg){kind=small}
