Gaseous signaling molecules received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry
Gaseous signaling molecules is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology
This article should not be speedy deleted as having no substantive content, because i am still working on it right now (your reason here) --Roman Bekker (talk) 21:58, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a technical review journal. It is an encyclopedia (general overviews). The relevant guidelines are WP:SECONDARY. Also be careful not to cite yourself or your colleagues. It's called conflict of interest. Many new editors cite themselves mainly. See WP:COI. That behavior is unacceptable. If you have questions, many editors can offer advice. Happy editing. --Smokefoot (talk) 00:46, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Where do you see "citing yourself" or "citing colleagues"? Where do you see "conflict of interest"? There in an article is a LOT of secondary sources, which are all PubMed-indexed and authoritative. And I'm NOT a "new editor" - I've been there in Wikipedia for about 10 years. Not always very active though. Roman Bekker (talk) 07:18, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]