Talk:Gary Sambrook
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Semi-protected edit request on 26 October 2020
[edit]Done
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In the section 'In October 2020, Sambrook voted against extending free school meals to eligible children during school holidays.[6] This could have helped over 6,000 children within his constituency.[7] In response, a vicious graffito appeared in his constituency reading "Gary Sambrook eats big dinners".[8]' Remove the unnecessary word 'vicious' as it is subjective and there is no evidence to support it. Philistine055 (talk) 21:40, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- Removed. DuncanHill (talk) 22:01, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Neutrality
[edit]"This could have helped over 6,000 children within his constituency" is not a neutral statement, given that it indicates that 6000 children went unhelped. That particular sentence should probably just be deleted. /Julle (talk) 23:30, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- I'd normally have waited longer, but since this was a (perceived) POV problem in a BLP article, I went ahead and removed it now. Politics can always benefit one group or another; we normally don't indicate a decision as a refusal to help someone. /Julle (talk) 10:41, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Grammar
[edit]Please stop reverting simple grammar changes, if you require explaination of why grammar edits have been made, speak about it on the talk page before reversion.
- Biography articles of living people
- Active politicians
- Stub-Class Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- Unknown-importance Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- Stub-Class biography articles
- Stub-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles