Jump to content

Talk:Galaxy 15

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

http://news.yahoo.com/s/space/20100503/sc_space/outofcontrolsatellitethreatensothernearbyspacecraft

Interactive Illustration of Satellite Neighborhood for Galaxy 15

[edit]

[1]Orbital neighborhood where Galaxy 15 will pass.Twpyle (talk) 12:02, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's just SES birds. Lyngsat has info on many more communications satellites.
Meanwhile, can Galaxy 15 really be said to be geostationary now?  :-)—Dah31 (talk) 04:28, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

The article has a banner reading 

"This article contains orbital elements but does not include an epoch, or date when those elements, which typically vary over time, were correct. Please help by adding the epoch for the current data, or changing the orbital elements to ones with a known epoch."

From my reading of the article, every reference to an orbital position has a date context. Please provide any specific cases where the concern of the banner is met, or I will remove the banner shortly. Savlonn (talk) 10:44, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template removed. Savlonn (talk) 15:52, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Galaxy 15 longitude?

[edit]

Galaxy 15 longitude is said to be "133° West" in the first paragraph of this article, "93° West" in the infobox, and "72 degrees-W" in the NASA NSSDC Catalog ([[2]]). Too much values for one longitude? --Utma Falos (talk) 02:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Galaxy 15. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:32, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Galaxy 15. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:04, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Conplan 8888?

[edit]

"Zombie satellites can be classified as SZ's, however they pose no danger to humans (unless they conduct an unplanned de-orbit). Typically, zombie satellites only pose a threat the SATCOM services like DirectTV (Refer to Galaxy 15 incident-May 2010)"

A statement from Conplan 8888 Wikitrumpets (talk) 00:53, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Galaxy_15&oldid=1202192658"