Talk:Fushimi-no-miya

Japan: Royalty & nobility High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 18:05, November 25, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Royalty and nobility task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Project Assessment

Thank you for this list of the succession of princes; it obviously took quite a bit of work. However, the prose paragraph content of this article is quite short, and I wonder if it can be expanded. Also, I had read that all of the secondary branches of the Imperial family were eliminated during the Occupation, which is part of why it would be next to impossible for a princess to marry inside the imperial family without marrying an especially close relative. Is the Fushimi-no-miya line still intact and considered to be "imperial"? LordAmeth 18:37, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed split

Split Fushimi-no-miya into Fushimi-no-miya and Family tree of the extended Japanese line of succession. If agreed, I {cannot} do the split.

I want to split the sectionm Fushimi-no-miya#Family Tree into its own article. Cannot do it on my own.

I think this isn't exaclty fitting for the article but it is useful as its own article. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 04:26, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you think it would not be fitting here as is? It seems sensible to me to keep the family tree in the main article on the family, as long as the family article is otherwise so short. Felix QW (talk) 09:33, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]