Talk:Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Untitled
[edit]Please feel free to add to this entry. I tried to cover the main concepts of FRBR. I also tried to link to the most pertinent related things -- AACR2, RDA, IFLA. There is a host of stuff that's related but I was trying to stick to the KISS theory (Keep It Simple...)
There are still a few outstanding things to add:
- see ref to FRBR
- clean up the citations -- they aren't done quite correctly
- nice to have would be the visual of the relationships between entities, esp. Group 1
--krislibrarian 15:43, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
Example
[edit]I'd be interested in seeing an example on this page.
--TimNelson (talk) 00:48, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
I added one, using Beethoven's Ninth Symphony. I'm not a FRBR expert, though. dweinberger 15:54, 12 August 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dweinberger (talk • contribs)
- I think it's easier to use the example in the Italian articles which is novel > translation > edition > copy of the book. Nemo 22:37, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090626072246/http://www.rda-jsc.org:80/rdaprospectus.html to http://www.rda-jsc.org/rdaprospectus.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:29, 6 January 2017 (UTC)