This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature
After consideration, I've removed the {{db-spam}} tags from the article, since it doesn't appear to be blatant advertising. However, the article has some severe flaws. First is the fact that the article is all in-universe: discussion of concepts in the book with no commentary on the book itself. Second, it fails to demonstrate notability: the author is non-notable, the book has not been released, and no independent commentary is mentioned in the article. Finally, it cites primary sources only.
Does anybody see any merits to the article that I've missed? Otherwise...well, I'll prod the article, but will probably wind up sending it (and likely Vampire academy at the same time) to AfD. —C.Fred (talk) 19:23, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]