Talk:French ironclad Normandie

French ironclad Normandie has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 7, 2014. (Reviewed version).

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

Military history: Maritime / European / French

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:French ironclad Normandie/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 13:20, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I enjoyed the last one, so sign me up to this one too. I'll review later this evening. Miyagawa (talk) 13:20, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, I got caught up doing some other work last night. But here is the review at last.

No duplicate links.
No external links to check.
All offline sources accepted in good faith as reliable.
Everything is linked very well, nothing is overlinked to other articles but in all first instances of some terminology that someone not familiar with the subject might not know appears, it's linked appropriately.
Lead is suitably constructed.

Article looks complete given the availability of sources. Happy for it to pass as a GA. Miyagawa (talk) 19:23, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]