Jump to content

Talk:Free Radical Design/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Nottingham

I know people think sandicare is in nottingham and free radical give nottingham out as its address but it is not in nottingham. It is in derby. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.10.30.30 (talk) 15:05, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

While Sandiacre is 'officially' in Derbyshire, it is part of Greater Nottingham I believe. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.2.111.154 (talk) 20:46, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Sandiacre also has a Nottingham postcode - so technically it is Nottingham. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.77.40.160 (talk) 02:57, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Article subject

I do not understand if this article is about Crytek UK or Free Radical Design, If it is the former, as indicated by the title, then of course a brief mention of the history of the former company is warranted; however, all I can deduce from sources is that FRD went into administration. It seems unclear whether portions or rights etc were bought by Crytek.

The article needs a radical overhaul. I have, today, removed the 'released games' - because, as indicated in the individual game articles, they were not released by this company, and the rights are now held by others.  Chzz  ►  18:44, 31 March 2009 (UTC)


The article is about one and the same - Crytek UK, which was formerly known as Free Radical Design, as stated in the article's lead. The company was bought out by Crytek, as stated in the article. The FRD games need to be back in this article as they were released by the same studio take Rare for example. As for reliable sources, IGN, Edge, CVG, Kotaku... Tphi (talk) 20:07, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

References

This article is in need of some reliable secondary sources to assert the facts it contains.  Chzz  ►  18:46, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

The image File:Crytek logo.svg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:30, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Star Wars Battlefront III

This is only speculated information. FRD nor LucasArts has confirmed nor denied that Free Radical will be working the next Battlefront game. This reference [1] simply quotes the same information as stated in previous links. Article reverted to unknown Star Wars title until it is confirmed information and not of the speculative nature. -HumanZoom 01:15, 3 October 2006 (UTC)


Kotaku already confirmed FRD is not the developer anymore. 72.144.122.97 (talk) 00:02, 9 February 2009 (UTC)


Free Radical Design was actually working on battlefront 3 from 2006 to 2008 which got cancelled when it was 99 percent complete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.184.141.134 (talk) 15:25, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Closure

It may have literally 'closed its doors' (i.e. not let its employees in) on December 18th, but its closure as a company is NOT confirmed. Read the Eurogamer article properly, please. THANKS!

There has been no official closure announced by the company. Its only a few sources saying its closed —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.29.222.168 (talk) 14:02, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

According to this source they have only entered Administration. - Dinnerbone (Talk/Cont) 14:56, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Local UK paper reports via its website about the situation at development studio Free Radical Design. It appears that the company entered administration yesterday and 185 jobs are at risk if the company shuts down. The word from Cameron Gunn of administrator Resolve Partners is as follows:

"We will be spending the next three or four days assessing the financial position of the company but it's business as usual, although we have asked that almost all of the employees apart from a skeleton crew remain at home," Gunn makes it clear and adds: "All employees have been paid up until the end of December and we hope to make another announcement before Christmas or very soon thereafter, but we must stress at this stage that it's business as usual."

So, I wonder if by "business as usual" they actually wanted to say that TimeSplitters 4 might actually see the light of day. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.29.222.168 (talk) 22:17, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Deep Silver Dambuster Studios

On July 30, Crytek sold the Homefront IP and its related assets to Deep Silver. Deep Silver said that development of the game will continue at a new studio called Deep Silver Dambuster Studios, which happens to be the renamed and repurposed Crytek UK. This would indicate that Crytek sold its UK studio (unsure if its other IPs, such as Second Sight, Timesplitters and Haze were sold along with it). So should Crytek UK be renamed Deep Silver Dambuster Studios. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Razzamatazz Buckshank (talk • contribs) 16:46, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

No, it is not re-named. Crytek specifically said that they were laid off, but did not say whether Crytek UK was shut down for good, implying they still own whatever's left. ViperSnake151  Talk  21:19, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Nobody knows about the legal details how this deal was settled. It's also not important. Public Reception is that Crytek sold the studio to Deep Silver, Crytek itself wrote "the Homefront team from Crytek's Nottingham studio would transfer their talents to Koch Media in compliance with English law and continue their hard work on upcoming shooter". The same guys are working under a new name at their former offices. This isn't different from the transition from Free Radical Games to Crytek UK or Volition, Inc. to Deep Silver Volition, LLC. -- 89.13.200.73 (talk) 09:12, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

I think a company tradition can be stated (Transfer of Undertakings, UK law), regardless of the technical detail of the transition process. The new studio is using the same offices as before, the same team is working on the same game. So I would move the article to Deep Silver Dambuster Studios. If the company should really become a milestone developer on its own, we can always split it again. -- Qafgbxvghnx (talk) 12:02, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Removing the original information about Free Radical, after it was acquired by Crytek, was vandalism

Since when is it alright to remove an entire page including a lot of inromation about a company once it went through acquisition? Besides, Free radical was a company run by different people, doing entirely different projects than Crytek UK. This was vandalism at best. If you guys are going to redirect/rename the page to Deep Silver Dambuster Studios, like you did with FRD to Crytek UK before, then please at least this time retain the info instead of erasing it out of existance. Maybe someone will also have the time now to restore the original information about Free Radical and their project. Either way I hope that removing the FRD page was no Crytek management decision or something like that, considering how maliciously it was performed. Kulmanseidl (talk) 20:15, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Requested move 25 September 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus. A logical argument could be given for either name, so it would be better to have wider participation. EdJohnston (talk) 01:26, 3 October 2015 (UTC)


Crytek UK → Free Radical Design – The company was known longer as Free Radical Design than Crytek UK (9 years vs 5½ years). They developed all their most notable games as Free Radical. In none of the games they developed as Crytek UK, they were the primary development studio, all of them were co-productions. Mika1h (talk) 22:46, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 3 October 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Reasonable arguments made, unopposed. Jenks24 (talk) 08:43, 13 October 2015 (UTC)


Crytek UK → Free Radical Design – The company no longer exists in any form, and as such I believe there is no need to name the article after the company's "current" name. Also the company was known longer as Free Radical Design than Crytek UK (9 years vs 5½ years). They developed all their most notable games as Free Radical. In none of the games they developed as Crytek UK they were the primary development studio, all of them were co-productions. Mika1h (talk) 09:13, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

  • Support. Makes sense. As Crytek UK, they developed two multiplayer components and one Xbox 360 version of a game, while Free Radical Design did fully develop games. --Soetermans. T / C 10:41, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
  • The sources do not appear to discuss one incarnation of the developer much more than other. The (in)difference of time spent under one name as opposed to another is not a convincing argument for me. If the dev is better known by the first name, there should be sources to say as much—otherwise, it's best to leave it be. I am no longer watching this page—ping if you'd like a response czar 15:59, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Support: Unless there's convincing evidence to the contrary, I'd say "Free Radical Design" is clearly the common name, for the reasons listed by Mika1h. Another reason: almost everyone from Free Radical, including David Doak, left during the Crytek buyout period. Whether Crytek UK even qualifies as the same company is debatable. Not to mention that the sources agree on the company's original name: see Eurogamer in 2012 or VG24/7 in 2013 or Engadget in 2014, all well after the name change. There's a reason we call it Aqua Teen Hunger Force and not Aqua Teen Hunger Force Forever, even though the series ended under that name. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 05:36, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

merge into Dambuster Studios

this article should be merged into Dambuster Studios it is the same company, the closure and new founding are speculation Norschweden (talk) 00:50, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Sources speak of a transfer from Crytek UK to a new subsidiary entitiy of Deep Silver, clearly pointing out that Crytek UK closed down or was closing down. Corporate records also show the new company being incorporated on the given date, and the old one filing a voluntary strikeoff. IMO it would be wrong to merge these articles. Lordtobi (✉) 07:43, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Free Radical Design. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:48, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Free_Radical_Design/Archive_1&oldid=1260099065"