Jump to content

Talk:Fox Broadcasting Company

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Fox (channel))

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Fox Broadcasting Company. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:59, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Irrelevant information

[edit]

This passage "Most viewers in Canada have access to at least one U.S.-based Fox affiliate, either over-the-air or through a pay television provider, although Fox's National Football League telecasts and most of its prime time programming are subject to simultaneous substitution regulations for cable and satellite providers imposed by the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) to protect rights held by domestically based networks." is neither sourced nor relevant to an American domestic television network, furthermore it's neither sourced, nor does the Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission have any oversight over the Fox Network. It should either be sourced or deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.240.231.252 (talk) 04:13, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Restored, do not remove; the CRTC oversees the carriage of all over-the-air signals and can assert simultaneous substitution of advertising to protect Canadian advertisers on stations outside Canada, and yeah...radio waves aren't usually stopped by an imaginary construct like a national border. Next time you want to remove something, take some time to search around for basic known information and use common sense. Nate (chatter) 00:52, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on Fox Broadcasting Company. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes: emergeces only

frame|center

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:21, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Fox Broadcasting Company. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:49, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Fox Broadcasting Company

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Fox Broadcasting Company's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "chicagotribune.com":

  • From Chicago Tribune: "Chicago Tribune Pulitzer Prizes". Chicago Tribune.
  • From Peter Liguori: "Liguori Named CEO of Tribune Company". Retrieved 17 January 2013.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 01:46, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fox (Romania)

[edit]

Launched on September 17, 2017. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kirwani90 (talkcontribs) 07:24, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, go away. That is completely untrue. Stop vandalizing Wikia and Wikipedia. Do you really have nothing better to do with your life? —  Andreyyshore  T  C  13:45, 14 Sep 2017 (UTC) 
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Fox Broadcasting Company. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:18, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

http://variety.com/2017/tv/news/disney-deal-whats-left-at-fox-1202636629/

Note Fox Broadcasting Company, Fox News and Fox Television stations are not included in the 2017 Fox/Disney deal according to Variety. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.169.130.165 (talk) 17:14, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Walt Disney Company

[edit]

Since neither Fox Broadcasting Company nor MyNetworkTV are part of the acquisition of 21st Century Fox by the Walt Disney Company, I can only imagine what new company they'll be part of. AdamDeanHall (talk) 18:52, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Imagination no longer necessary: Fox Corporation. - BilCat (talk) 06:19, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 14 February 2020

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover)Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 09:28, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Fox Broadcasting CompanyFox (American TV network) – Per WP:NCDAB and WP:COMMONNAME. Although the article titles guideline does prefer natural disambiguation over others, it also states that the natural disambiguation must be "unambiguous, commonly used, and clear". "Fox Broadcasting Company" fails the "commonly used" criteria, as the network is referred to on-air and almost-exclusively by reliable sources as simply "Fox" rather than by this formal name. While there has been an increased use of "Fox Entertainment" since the Disney sale, this actually refers to a parent division encompassing Fox and its new in-house entertainment operations since the sale. See also the rejected move of Amazon (company) to its formal name Amazon.com, Inc., as "Amazon" is overwhelmingly the name used by reliable sources (contrast Apple Inc., which actually does have enough use to support the use of this name). ViperSnake151  Talk  18:46, 14 February 2020 (UTC)Relisted. – Ammarpad (talk) 06:12, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.