Talk:Forum Group
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Objective stance
[edit]"Thanks to Papas the business has now been liquidated, over 50% of the staff have been terminated and have not received their entitlements while he is seen drinking cocktails in his luxury abode on the Mediterranean.[17]"
This is a a comment that would fit in an opinion column of some weekly magazine, but does not so in a Wikipedia page where objectivity should be prevalent. 101.100.155.176 (talk) 22:19, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Very much agreed and I'll take a stab at rewriting. Definitely a WP:NPOV and WP:DUE violation. Lizthegrey (talk) 06:26, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Stub-Class AfC articles
- AfC submissions by date/22 July 2016
- Accepted AfC submissions
- Start-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- Start-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles