Talk:Forever in Love (instrumental)

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Jazz

	Jazz portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Songs

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool based on the length of the article. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: move to Forever in Love (instrumental), move Forever in Love (disambiguation) to Forever in Love, ~~move Forever in Love (Sylver song) to Forever in Love (song)~~(see amendment below). -- tariqabjotu 16:55, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Forever in Love → ? – Obviously, the title is ambiguous. How is the Kenny G sax song the most prominent topic of other songs of the same name, like of Sylver? --Relisted. -- tariqabjotu 18:57, 29 July 2013 (UTC) George Ho (talk) 06:46, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I just created Forever in Love (disambiguation). But I'm not volunteering to fix http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Forever_in_Love In ictu oculi (talk) 23:07, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support There's no primary topic, but let me suggest this arrangement: Move Forever in Love (disambiguation) to Forever in Love, Forever in Love to Forever in Love (instrumental), and Forever in Love (Sylver song) to Forever in Love (song). This is in line with WP:NCM's recommendations for disambiguation. --BDD (talk) 17:55, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support move this to Forever in Love (Kenny G song), do not move the other song, point Forever in Love (song) to the diambiguation page, as there are multiple songs. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 04:23, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's worth noting that, WikiProject banner notwithstanding, the subject of this article is not actually a song. --BDD (talk) 15:12, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's WP:JARGON when not referring to it as a song, since in common parlance, this would be a song. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 05:26, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

~~Comment~~. Support as per BDD above - move to Forever in Love (instrumental) (save that moving the Sylver song is pointless). Notwithstanding a general agreement with 76 above, instrumentals are usually disambiguated by (instrumental) and I can't see any reason why it shouldn't apply to a Kenny G piece. ~~Perhaps User:Tariqabjotu could consider changing his nomination in this light?~~ --Richhoncho (talk) 10:05, 4 August 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Amended my comments above. --Richhoncho (talk) 15:31, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I requested the move; Tariqabjotu just relisted it. I stand on my position by having no preference to one another. --George Ho (talk) 16:34, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I was just about to move to Forever in Love (instrumental) when I decided I had better confirm there are no objections. Any objections? --Richhoncho (talk) 12:38, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, although non-administrator closures aren't bad, you have already voted "support" on "(instrumental)", didn't you? Even if not, I recommended that you slightly alter "comment" to "support". Therefore, someone else, like an admin, can do the move. --George Ho (talk) 14:13, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I think I should point out that, according to our article, the OED includes a musical composition suggestive of song as one meaning of song. So this definitely qualifies, as does for example Lily Was Here. Andrewa (talk) 15:17, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

I've reversed the move of Forever in Love (Sylver song) to Forever in Love (song) (see User talk:Tariqabjotu#Talk:Forever in Love (instrumental)). I'm making no determination on that move (and, likewise, I am making no determination on what to do with Forever in Love (song)). If anyone would like Forever in Love (Sylver song) moved to Forever in Love (song), please request that move at Talk:Forever in Love (Sylver song). -- tariqabjotu 02:57, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Forever in Love (instrumental). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061110095203/http://longboredsurfer.com/charts.php?year=1993 to http://longboredsurfer.com/charts.php?year=1993

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:59, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]