Talk:Fokker Next Gen

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands

Description

This article should describe Rekkof for what it is: an enduring unrealistic dream and vision. Andries 22:02, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And do you still think that today. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.166.64.161 (talk) 22:13, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Canadair

Why type "Canadair", when that name and company hasn't existed for over a decade and the current name of that business is commonly known globally. Please let "Bombardier Aerospace" be the correct reference and not some relic of the past that noone can refer to. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.219.194.237 (talk) 00:30, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Canadair is still used to refer to the RJ, it is the CRJ... Canadair Regional Jet, or if you like, the Bombardier Canadair Regional Jet. 76.66.196.229 (talk) 12:56, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]