This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Finland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FinlandWikipedia:WikiProject FinlandTemplate:WikiProject FinlandFinland
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
We can merge this into Advocatus. I think I came across it on Norwegian Wikipedia and translated it since none of the Scandinavian-language articles on it were linked to any concepts on English Wikipedia. There are a lot of gaps in linking concepts across languages on here and it's easy to accidentally double up on them when trying to fix that. I'm fine with merging the two. flod logic (talk) 10:05, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
One way or another we need a strategy going forward because there are a few mix-ups and none of the articles really explain the whole big picture very well. There probably do need to be articles for regional variants, but at the very least the various articles need to be linked to each other in clear ways.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 10:15, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]