Talk:Flower Films
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]The references don't really point to any material of direct relevance. Wouldn't it be better to remove them? MartinDK 15:01, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- I fixed the IMDb link to point to the Flower Films page. The other references should be updated to point to the relevant page, but they shouldn't be removed entirely unless we can cite better references for the information in the article. Orayzio 21:02, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
The movie times site is fairly convoluted. That information I cited isn't on the-movie-times.com site in any one place. Orayzio fixed the IMDB link. The other two sites may not really add much to the article. I'd be ok with eliminating them. C. Kilpatrick 19:51, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class company articles
- Unknown-importance company articles
- Automatically assessed Companies articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Stub-Class film articles
- Stub-Class filmmaking articles
- Filmmaking task force articles
- Stub-Class American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles