Talk:Floral Shoppe

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Electronic music Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Further Details

The page needs some additional info on the creation of the album. Inspiration, concept, reviews, and other concepts relating to the production of the album. These are pretty general details because what needs to be added is pretty general. Just overall expansion of the article. Semancion (talk) 10:15, 31 August 2014 (UTC) Quick update: I'll also be adding the translation and pronunciation of the song titles shortly. Semancion (talk) 12:03, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Track List

The tracks were all originally written in Japanese (with the exception of Untitled 1 & 2), wouldn't it be better to write the original Japanese version first, then write the romanized version in the parentheses? The way it is now just seems improper. Semancion (talk) 08:59, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cover art change

Does anyone know why the cover artwork was changed? I haven't been able to find any information on this. The article shows two versions of the artwork, but the one it presents as primary is not the original, which a quick google search shows is the version favoured by the vast majority of online sources. —Flax5 18:55, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The new cover was added in this edit and the old one here, so it looks like the newer cover was present before. I think the original should be used as the only cover per the template documentation, and because using both covers as "the primary means of visual identification" would violate our Non-free content criteria. Opencooper (talk) 19:08, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find a source but the cover does appear to use this very image from the article on Helios, which was uploaded a few months before the album came out. Perhaps they were worried about the license. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 17:00, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

At the time of uploading, the album artwork on the label's website featured a different cover than the one with which the album was popularly associated (this is where I pulled the "new" cover). At the time, I didn't have an official source for the "old" cover, and so I listed it as an alternate cover. Had I done a bit more digging, I would have found that the album's original artwork was here. Anyway, the way I saw it at the time was that both needed to be included to fully understand the article, but one of them (the new one) was considered the official artwork while the original cover was the one by which the album was more readily identifiable. I felt that the album covers were significantly different to the extent that the general guidelines for WP:NFCC#3 would allow for both album covers being displayed on the article. I still find this to be the case, as both (and now the additional cassette artwork) reflect different releases of the album and appear to be significantly different. Semancion (talk) 09:51, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Original video on youtube is down

the original video is down! we have to add that the video is no longer available. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lajkdksfssssssimpsonss (talk • contribs) 14:25, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is mentioned:

The song had over 40.5 million views on YouTube before being taken down on April 27, 2018.

Opencooper (talk) 17:09, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Lisa Frank 420.ogg

File:Lisa Frank 420.ogg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a non-free use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

-- Marchjuly (talk) 04:22, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]