Talk:Five Pieces for Orchestra

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

Source

The Erickson source may be found on the image page. Apparently I forgot to copy it over here. Hyacinth 21:37, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(----Five Pieces for Orchestra is not the most original title for a seminal work but I suggest you consider the more important pieces by Anton Webern that, for me, were a tangible advance in 20th century music.82.53.216.49 (talk) 13:25, 3 September 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Requested move 10 November 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 08:08, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Five Pieces for Orchestra → Five Pieces for Orchestra (Schoenberg) – There is Five Pieces for Orchestra (Webern) (currently lacking an article), which is also a famous work with the same title. People who know one are likely to know the other so it is not obvious that one is the primary topic. Stockhausenfan (talk) 05:19, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose for now per WP:OVERPRECISION. There is only one article at the moment. If and when an article about the Webern piece is written, this can be reconsidered. Station1 (talk) 08:10, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Per Station1, and the composer's name when he wrote this was Schönberg, - it would sound historically wrong. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:20, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I prefer Schönberg too, but there seems to currently be a consensus to use "oe" on the English Wikipedia, see e.g. Drei Klavierstücke (Schoenberg). A bit silly in my opinion but I can't do anything about it; I'm fine if people decide to change my nomination to ö. Stockhausenfan (talk) 15:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Unless and until Five Pieces for Orchestra (Webern) is created, this is unambiguous. No objection to adding a hatnote to List of compositions by Anton Webern. 162 etc. (talk) 19:28, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wait/Oppose until an article for Webern is created. Scharb (talk) 19:49, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.