Talk:Fifteenth Dynasty of Egypt

The corresponding article uses material copied and pasted from other pages, and is therefore likely to become outdated over time. Please transclude relevant material from other pages so that it will remain synced. The following reason was given: The table of pharaohs should be transcluded from list of pharaohs to prevent content forking, pending discussion on the improvement of that article.

Ancient Egypt Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ancient Egypt to-do list:

Needed articles.

We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.

Cleanup.

To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?

Standardize the Chronology.

A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)

Stub sorting

Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .

Data sorting.

This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.

Former countries

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country

Biography: Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Egypt Low‑importance

	Egypt portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sheshi

Why isn't Sheshi listed here? His article says he was a fifteenth dynasty ruler. P Ingerson (talk) 16:42, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, this isn't a list as much as a sucession order, and unless we have his position or argued position in the order, we can't put him in. In all likelyhood, however, he's probably a duplicate of someone like salatis. Thanatosimii 20:27, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Tenth dynasty of Egypt - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 23:20, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Hyksos

Hi Dimadick, you reverted my attempt to redirect this article to Hyksos with the explanation None of the rulers and their identification is covered in the Hyksos article. However, there is an entire section on this, see Hyksos#Rulers.----Ermenrich (talk) 17:17, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

None of the articles on the rulers are linked, their seals are not included, their dates are not included. Everything that the dynasty article has. Dimadick (talk) 17:23, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The rulers are linked as they appear in the text. The dates are uncertain: no one agrees on them. The seals are unimportant, particularly given that only one source thinks two of them belong to Hyksos rulers, and they can be added if you think they're important. I'm not sure I understand your fundamental objections. The information at Hyksos is clearly much better than what's found here, and I'm not just saying that because I wrote it. It uses many more sources than here.--Ermenrich (talk) 17:30, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Additions

The text that's been added relies heavily on a single work, that of Kim Ryholt and some other works, such as the Encylopedia of Ancient Egypt, which were originally printed in the early 90s. While many of Ryholt's conclusions have been generally accepted (that the sixteenth dynasty aren't Hyksos, for instance, but Thebans) many have not. The study of the second intermediate period has advanced substantially since the 90s due to new archaeological discoveries and new consensus positions.

Just a few examples:

Ryholt's claim that Hyksos wasn't a title used by the Hyksos kings or that only the initial Hyksos kings used it at all is disputed
Ryholt's description of the range of Hyksos rule and the idea that they invaded and replaced the 14th Dynasty are disputed
Ryholt's ordering of the Hyksos kings is disputed
The idea that Khyan conquered all of Egypt is disputed and I believe generally disfavored now
The notion that Hyksos destroyed temples or "ruled without Re" has been generally refuted

More recent sources are cited at Hyksos in the relevant sections, which include some statements of WP:RS/AC on them as well. Most of the sources can be found via google books, Academia.edu, or JSTOR. I'm also happy to provide sources for each of my points.

I am also somewhat concerned that this now just duplicates information found at Hyksos, but that's probably more of a point for the merger discussion.--Ermenrich (talk) 12:38, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Transclusion tag added to Talk page, July 2024

Please see the tag for link to discussion on relevant talkpage. Neatly95 (talk) 17:05, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]