Jump to content

Talk:Fierce Five

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The team's original nickname should also be in the lead

[edit]

To properly comply with the Manual of Style, the team's original nickname of "Fab Five" should be located in the lead of the article. Per WP:Lead#Alternative_names "When this title is a name, significant alternative names for the topic should be mentioned in the article, usually in the first sentence or paragraph. These may include alternative spellings, longer or shorter forms, historical names, and significant names in other languages." Rreagan007 (talk) 01:29, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I reworded this so the original nickname is mentioned in the lead, as it has its own Nickname category. However, but does not have the bold status, so this is comparable to other unofficial "Fab Fives" like the team from Queer Eye for the Straight Guy. The team also made a concentrated effort to pick a non-trademarked name. -AngusWOOF (talk) 19:06, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The Manual of Style is clear that alternative titles should both be in the lead AND in bold typeface; however, I'm willing to accept this compromise. Rreagan007 (talk) 19:46, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Fierce Five. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:11, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fierce Five. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:26, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Fierce Five/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Riley1012 (talk · contribs) 20:53, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Arconning (talk · contribs) 02:51, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Will review in a few days ^ Arconning (talk) 02:51, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Riley1012 Here are my short comments! Arconning (talk) 14:13, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @Arconning: I've addressed your comments! -Riley1012 (talk) 22:18, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Prose and MoS

[edit]

Lead and infobox

[edit]
  • No issues from my part.

Team background

[edit]
  • No issues.

Olympic Trials

[edit]
  • No issues.

Nickname and captain

[edit]
  • No issues.

2012 Summer Olympics

[edit]
  • Capitalize "black" as it's referring to the race.

 Done -Riley1012 (talk) 22:18, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Post-Olympics

[edit]
  • Kellogg's Tour of Gymnastics Champions, wikilink Kellog's.
  • Season 16 of Dancing with the Stars, this shouldn't probably be capitalized.
  • Wikilink USA Gymnastics, 2024 U.S. Championships, U.S. Senate and FBI.

All  Done -Riley1012 (talk) 22:18, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Media

[edit]
  • All images are relevant to the article and have appropriate captions.

Refs

[edit]
  • Earwig's alright.
  • Random ref check: 1, 15, 21, 26, 33, 40, 48, 55, 57, 72. All good.

Misc

[edit]
  • No ongoing edit war, neutral, broad enough information about the topic.