Talk:Fenton Communications

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Keep, 20 September 2023, see discussion.
keep, 11 November 2013 (UTC), see discussion.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Business

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Largest

The claim to be the largest in their specific discipline was a self-claim and identified / referenced as such in one of the earlier versions of this page. Since then this page has been modified by what appear to be SPAs with probable conflicts of interest. This page has never been much more than a stub, but I don't think the self-interested editing has necessarily done much to improve it. Dragons flight (talk) 16:59, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No reference to having been hired by Wikimedia Foundation

At a minimum that should be disclosed 24.110.248.194 (talk) 02:35, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you find a reliable source you can add it yourself. Sean.hoyland - talk 13:11, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Malik Shabazz inventing

No source as noted above for Wikimedia foundation. has been removed - yet Shabazz is warning to block me if I try and remove it. help. Richie1921 (talk) 04:23, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Did you notice that the message above was nearly four-and-a-half years old?!? There is a source for the Wikimedia Foundation, and it's been there since (at least) 2009:

Ciarallo, Joe (August 17, 2009). "Fenton Communications Wins $250k Wikimedia Project". PR Newser. Media Bistro. Retrieved 1 December 2014.

— Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 04:45, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Fenton Communications. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:02, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]