Talk:Feminine style of management
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]So I think I may have misled you to equating women with a feminine style of management. However, just because Carly Fiorina and Margaret Thatcher are women does not mean they used a feminine style of management. As a matter of fact, Carly Fiorina decidedly did not.
So we need to look for people who others have identified as having some of the characteristics of a feminine (nurturing, supportive, collaborative) style of management. We might even think about what types of organizations tend to operate under this style of leadership (often nonprofits as their work is driven by human needs and thus the leadership style must be empathic.)
It would also be nice to see if we might find a male leader who has been identified with a "feminine" style of leadership.
Since I may have misled you I would love to meet and talk to you if you can get to class perhaps a few minutes early on Monday. Don't worry about the deadline - this can be something you address over the next few weeks. I just really think it would be nice to give a clear representation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Llbritt (talk • contribs) 19:37, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Pointless list removed
[edit]There was an odd list included of women who had held some post such as "acting head of state" somewhere, and even numerous "captains general of San Merino," but did not show how they used a "feminine style of management" and how it worked out. The strange list left out actual female heads of state of the present and recent past in Israel, Great Britain and Germany. I removed it since it did not improve the article, and seemed intended to promote the fame of a few politicians. Edison (talk) 03:07, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Feminine style of management. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111128040043/http://www.businessweek.com:80/2000/00_47/b3708145.htm to http://www.businessweek.com/2000/00_47/b3708145.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:33, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment
[edit]This article is the subject of an educational assignment at James Madison University supported by WikiProject Organizational Communication theory or practice and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.
The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}}
by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:43, 2 January 2023 (UTC)