Jump to content

Talk:Feiz Mohammad

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Additions

[edit]

Some significant additions were made to this article. While I respect WP:DBTN, I don't think the changes followed the manual of style, were of a neutral point of view, and were unreferenced. Recurring dreams

Wow. Don't forget the Original Research either. Prester John 03:39, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lacks of balanced data from the point of view of the main character and his associates.

NPOV tag

[edit]

Please specify exactly what is NPOV. I will remove the tag unless I know what is being pointed out. SmithBlue (talk) 02:48, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User 60.49.220.194 on 16:32, 16 September 2007 wrote "Lacks of balanced data from the point of view of the main character and his associates." I am removing the tag as this reason is not a sufficient reason for a NPOV tag - you need to show that there is information published by a reliable source showing a point of view not included in this article. (Click on WP:RS to read about reliable sources.) Otherwise none of your fellow editors or readers can verify the information. SmithBlue (talk) 04:52, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely Wahhabi

[edit]

"Educated" in Saudi Arabia. Born in Australia, not Lebanon. One of the better-known Sunni anglophone rabble rousers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.121.88.198 (talk) 07:56, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear Sentence

[edit]

In the documentary, he says of non-Muslims, in his 'Signs of the Hour' speech', in one DVD, Mohammed said that children should be encouraged to become jihadists: "We want to have children and offer them as soldiers defending Islam... Teach them this: there is nothing more beloved to me than wanting to die as a mujahid. Put in their soft, tender hearts the zeal of jihad and a love of martyrdom."

Improper linkage

[edit]

It is completely improper to link Feiz Mohammad to the bombings in any way, shape or form. The other incidents cited on this page involve specific acts by Mohammad that have been offensive, despicable, condemned, etc. There is no evidence at all that Mohammad encouraged the attacks or was involved in any way, shape or form in their planning. Merely having been linked on someone's YouTube channel is one of the flimsiest attempts at guilt by association that I've ever seen. Per the biographies of living persons policy, I am removing the imputation that Mohammad had anything to do with the attacks. polarscribe (talk) 07:21, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia reportage on what the Australian Attorney General has had to say about Feiz Muhammad, and what Feiz Mohammed has volunteered to say about the Boston Bombing is not remotely guilt by association on the part of Wikipedia. 58.165.90.197 (talk) 08:13, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with IP ... it is being sorted out. The appropriate material should remain.--Epeefleche (talk) 08:43, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 5 external links on Feiz Mohammad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:35, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Feiz Mohammad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:15, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Feiz_Mohammad&oldid=1209121790"