Talk:Fashion Model Directory
Appearance
This page was proposed for deletion by Jac16888 (talk · contribs) on 24 April 2016 with the comment: Unsourced, no real indication of notability It was contested by Rebbing (talk · contribs) on 2016-04-25 with the comment: The article isn't great, but, in my opinion, it could be improved. The fact that it's linked from over a thousand articles leads me to believe that deletion should only happen after AfD, if it all. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Vandalism
[edit]Obviously, wikibots and editors are fighting against vandalism in this article. Therefore, I kindly ask to semi-protect this article for the time of the moderators choice to avoid IP/anonymous-entries. ► robomod 22:34, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
- Not done: requests for changes to the page protection level should be made at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. RudolfRed (talk) 04:31, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
modelling agencies ?
[edit]Does anyone know which term is the correct one? "Modelling agencies" or "modeling agencies"? ► robomod 16:14, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- Done I corrected it. It is "Modeling" agencies", with one L, not two. It was originally misspelled "Modelling" several times in the article. --QuickEditor (talk) 20:57, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
- Actually, both are correct. One is English English and one is US English. D'oh. You should usually maintain the version in which the article was started unless there is an extremely good reason to change. In this instance, I think the barometer would be how FMD describe themselves - so check their website & follow that. - Sitush (talk) 18:15, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
- Done I corrected it. It is "Modeling" agencies", with one L, not two. It was originally misspelled "Modelling" several times in the article. --QuickEditor (talk) 20:57, 23 July 2011 (UTC)