Jump to content

Talk:FC Barcelona 2–8 FC Bayern Munich

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 17 August 2020

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Withdrawing due to the arguments raised above. A discussion to handle the other cases may be started at WT:WPF. Eumat114 (Message) 13:38, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]



FC Barcelona 2–8 FC Bayern MunichBarcelona 2–8 Bayern Munich – As per precedents, "Barcelona" is usually in favour of "FC Barcelona" in match titles, e.g. in Barcelona 6–1 Paris Saint-Germain, and similarly with "Bayern Munich" instead of "FC Bayern Munich", e.g. in Bayern Munich 1–2 Norwich City (1993). Eumat114 (Message) 12:45, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. RedPatchBoy (talk) 16:25, 17 August 2020 (UTC) [reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Why is the 4-1 result in 2024 considered irrelevant?

[edit]

In the article about the 6-1 Barcelona vs. PSG game, the 2024 meeting is mentioned even though it is "not" considered very relevant. So why are the games between Bayern and Barcelona in the following two seasons considered relevant, but the most recent one (where Barcelona finally won) is deemed "not relevant"? Especially since it is noted that Hansi Flick was appointed as Barcelona's manager. I believe the fact that he defeated his former team 4-1 (and let's not forget Lewandowski's contribution) is worth mentioning. If not, then the other Bayern wins should also be removed for consistency. 2A02:14F:175:A6BC:0:0:4DEA:7D6E (talk) 13:59, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]