Talk:Eric Byler

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).

Virginia: Albemarle County Low‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albemarle County, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

EricByler52 (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection.

where's the tag??

There is supoosed to be conflict of interest tag...

and where's the part that says "utter bias?" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.54.22.188 (talk) 11:06, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I edited it... removed the bias, etc. Ya know, things on here aren't static. Qb | ^{your 2 cents} 19:43, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Really? Then how come I see "Most recently, Byler spent the better part of a day typing all of this stuff about himself into Wikipedia." ???

OOPS! Too late, I've already captured a screenshot :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.54.22.188 (talk) 23:07, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because it was overlooked. Screenshots are useless when there is a history that any and all are free to access. Stupid vandalism is hardly something to get worked up about, isnt it? Qb | ^{your 2 cents} 06:27, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]