Talk:Elizabeth Hirsh Fleisher

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	It is requested that a picture or pictures be included in this article to improve its quality.

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	It is requested that an image or images be included in this article to improve its quality.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women artists

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists

Women in Red: Women in Architecture (2015)

This article was created or improved during the Women in Architecture edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Red project in October 2015. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red

Replacement of a good photo with a bad one

Smallbones, your obsession with eradicating every trace of MyWikiBiz is blinding you to the purpose for which you're supposed to be here, which is improving the content of the encyclopedia.

Here's the photograph you want removed, and your replacement for it.

Your photograph is blurry, lacking in contrast with a washed out sky, obscured in the foreground by a fence, and badly cropped. Viewing each at full resolution reveals a wealth of detail in the original, while yours is a soup of pixel mud. It looks like it was taken on a cheap webcam. You're a terrible photographer, and by inserting this image into the article you've actually made it worse.

Find something useful to do on Wikipedia. Preferably not involving you and a camera. — Scott • talk 17:27, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Scott: that comment is way out of line. Jonathunder (talk) 03:00, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Far further out of line is edit warring to replace a decent picture with a terrible one in pursuit of a personal vendetta. But I guess one man's "out of line" is another man's "wikipedia."Dan Murphy (talk) 04:56, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For posterity's sake, it may be worth noting this public discussion of which of the two photos is the "better" one for this article. Looks like the blue-sky photo by the banned Wikipedia editor won by a landslide over the gray-sky photo by the Wikipedian in good standing. - 2601:42:C100:9D83:D2E:AAEB:FA46:AAD4 (talk) 13:54, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]