Talk:Elevator
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Elevator article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 6 months |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Elevator received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Climbing elevator
[edit]Add more details on self-ascending climbing elevators used in some towers and guyed masts for easier access to the top.
Notes Section in the Middle of the page removed
[edit]I have removed a section called NOTES that was located in the middle of the article. It's sources had no relavance to the article. Airplanegod (talk)#
Proposed merge of Double-deck elevator into Elevator
[edit]- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- Discussion appears to have slowed down. At the present moment there is no consensus to merge. NW1223(Howl at me/My hunts) 16:06, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
From the sources, this topic does not merit WP:GNG but the information could be moved into the article about Elevators in general. Aasim (talk) 19:21, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
- Support Double-deck elevator is little more than a list of double-deck elevators. The description and list (if needed) can easily be incorporated in this article. Meters (talk) 19:40, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
- We might want to split the list off into a stand-alone list. Meters (talk) 19:42, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
- Support Seems straightforward enough, no reason to have articles on every sub-type of elevator. ––FORMALDUDE(talk) 03:11, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose The list is too lengthy to incorporate into the main article, but moving it into a separate page with just the list would be inconvenient for readers. Therefore the current organization makes the most sense. --Albany NY (talk) 01:58, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose as Double-deck elevator is a distinct topic worth separate covereage and Elevator is WP:TOOBIG to accommodated a merge at 152k in length. Klbrain (talk) 16:07, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Mess
[edit]The article as it stands is a mess of random, disorganize elevator fanporn. EEng 23:18, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
- Anthony Donald Joseph Field btq 7 Brisbane Brisbane house sent there big red car ride now Elevator inside wiggle house Down under the car parks 101.188.189.73 (talk) 06:36, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- I rest my case. EEng 06:52, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
bznxjxz 2409:4061:8ECB:B36:0:0:71C8:8F01 (talk) 07:10, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- I further rest my case. EEng 09:22, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia articles that use American English
- C-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Technology
- C-Class vital articles in Technology
- C-Class Transport articles
- High-importance Transport articles
- WikiProject Transport articles
- C-Class Technology articles
- WikiProject Technology articles
- Old requests for peer review