Talk:Electoral integrity

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted on 12 January 2014 by reviewer Alanl (talk · contribs).

Politics

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Human rights

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Civic Education

Differences between electoral integrity and electoral malpractice 102.89.47.176 (talk) 21:33, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Materialscientist: Many useful edits are made by anonymous users. I prefer to see anonymous users encouraged to supply references or to expand further on their concerns. I don't see that comments like these from user:105.112.160.92 and user:102.89.47.176 do any harm, and they might inspire others to suggest further improvements to this article.

I'm concerned that deleting comments like these might drive people away unnecessarily, when a more friendly response might encourage some to make more useful contributions. ??? Thanks, DavidMCEddy (talk) 03:35, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]