Jump to content

Talk:Edward Hallstrom

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did he have Swedish ancestry?

[edit]

The name Hallstrom could be written with Swedish diacritics as Hallström or Hällström both of which are typical Swedish family names. The text mentions "an honorary Swedish knighthood" which certainly sounds more than what it probably was, but still amounts to a recognition from the Swedish government. The question is thus whether his Swedish-sounding family name indicates Swedish ancestry or is just a coincidence. Roufu (talk) 08:01, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Roufu:His Swedish-sounding family name does seem to indicate Swedish ancestry. According to his Australian Dictionary of Biography entry, his father (William Hallstrom) was English but of 'Swedish extraction'. The text in the article now includes that fact.TrimmerinWiki (talk) 09:59, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Edward Hallstrom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:29, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Edward Hallstrom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:01, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RMS or SS Osterly?

[edit]

@TrimmerinWiki:, [1], was it RMS or SS Osterly? SS Osterley makes no mention of ever being RMS. Mitch Ames (talk) 00:57, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Mitch Ames:Hi Mitch,Thank you for checking in on this. The Wikipedia page is SS Osterley but it is the same ship as RMS Osterley. That is clear because RMS Osterley is mentioned in a quote within the SS Osterley page, under the heading, Maiden voyage). Yes, Osterley was a steamship, but it seems that it spent much of its time as a Royal Mail Ship. I used RMS Osterley, because the reference that I cited about the Hallstrom wedding says that they left Brisbane for Sydney on RMS Osterley. So, at the time in question, it was RMS Osterley. TrimmerinWiki (talk) 02:40, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I missed that (I search for "RMS" not "R.M.S.".) It's probably worth mentioning explicitly in the lead of SS Osterley that it was also known as RMS - then we can also create a redirect RMS Osterley, and (what I was trying to do in the first place!) then use {{RMS}} in Edward Hallstrom. Mitch Ames (talk) 03:13, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]