Talk:East Stirlingshire F.C./GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 05:04, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I will copyedit and make straightforward changes as I go (please revert if I accidentally change the meaning) and jot queries below: Casliber (talk · contribs) 05:04, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
No need to bold words such as "Britannia" in the body of the prose.
No need to have all the F.C.s everywhere, they can all be abbreviated as I've done.
- Hello, I have seen to the above requests. Cal Umbra 07:51, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
This might be tricky, but the history section seems pretty bare of player names - were there players who were integral parts of the team for spells that are worth noting? Just a few here and there I think would help liven up the section.- I have mentioned the club's all-time top goalscorer Lawrence McLachlan who was influential in the club's early years and internationalist Eddie McCreadie who was sold to Chelsea with the funds helping the club to attract new players and win promotion. I have also mentioned the players' wages in the early 21st century in general as I think it is notably low for a senior club. Cal Umbra 16:02, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, this is good. Casliber (talk · contribs) 07:50, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
- I have mentioned the club's all-time top goalscorer Lawrence McLachlan who was influential in the club's early years and internationalist Eddie McCreadie who was sold to Chelsea with the funds helping the club to attract new players and win promotion. I have also mentioned the players' wages in the early 21st century in general as I think it is notably low for a senior club. Cal Umbra 16:02, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
- In general, try to condense prose into paragraphs - don't leave single sentences forming their own paragraphs..
1. Well written?:
- Prose quality:
- Manual of Style compliance:
2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
- References to sources:
- Citations to reliable sources, where required:
- No original research:
3. Broad in coverage?:
- Major aspects:
- Focused:
4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
- Fair representation without bias:
5. Reasonably stable?
- No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):
6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
- Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
- Pass or Fail: - a nice warm engaging article. Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:06, 29 March 2013 (UTC)