Talk:Duffel bag
This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Holdall
[edit]Definition revised fixed following extensive discussion on the language reference desk.--Shantavira|feed me 18:19, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Redundant Textile?
[edit]"...made of cloth (or other fabric)..." did this Both links (cloth and fabric) redirect to the same article, viz. Textile. BTW a ditty bag is a different from a sea bag - see http://www.frayedknotarts.com/files/dittybagbox.html for example. 122.106.177.130 (talk) 06:51, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Clarity
[edit]It is often used to carry luggage? I think that meant that it is used as a piece of luggage.
"Prussian soldiers of the 19th century are said to have called their rolled up greatcoats carried bandolier-fashion by the same name." ...greatcoats carried bandolier-fashion? What does that mean exactly. Is there a word or words missing? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:7:8500:982:D4FB:193:27FC:ADA6 (talk) 03:23, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- It means slung over the shoulder and across the chest and back to the opposite hip; a bit like American Civil War soldiers used their blankets. --Bermicourt (talk) 19:35, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
no a "kit bag" looks just like the image and is quite large - the British Army version was about 3-4 feet long)
[edit]"One British Army version" was about 3 feet long, yep, but the term was also used for sometimes smaller bags for specialized kit, for rectangular (but also large) aviator's bags, and for what later might be called a barracks back. The differences aren't just Pondial, but also over time and military class, and branch of service. A duffle bag, on the other hand, was more-or-les one critter up until the '70s. Anmccaff (talk) 22:55, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Changed some of the heading around, also added a section of pros and cons. All of my information was from cited sources, and those are also in the text. With these additions the term duffel bag is much for defined.--Jcrumpton (talk) 01:48, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
- Transwikied to Wiktionary
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- Start-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- Start-Class Tourism articles
- Low-importance Tourism articles
- WikiProject Travel and Tourism articles
- Start-Class sports articles
- WikiProject Sports articles
- Start-Class Containers articles