Jump to content

Talk:Drake Would Love Me/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Freikorp (talk · contribs) 01:55, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


  • "Michelle wrote the fans based on her experiences with female fans" - should this be 'wrote the song'
  • Can you expand/give any more detail on any of the people without wikilinks that are mentioned in the 'Background and recording' section, such as C Travis Kr8ts and Atterberry? No worries if the sourced don't say anything further about them.
  • "his grand prize" and he would "always be the same" and "play no games", while boasting that "she’d be the best he ever had in bed" - I think it should be clarified to the reader whether these are direct quotes from the song or the journalists interpretation of the song's message. I assumed they were direct quotes until I got to the last one, which isn't written in a first person narrative and therefore can't be a direct quote. Perhaps just mention that the last quote is the journalist's summary, assuming that is the case.
  • Also in the following sentence the 'grand prize' lyric is given again, I don't think you need to give it twice
  • "The song includes references to Drake's music" - can you give an example?
  • noted that Michelle "emphasizes certain syllables like surgical knife twists" - replace 'noted' as per WP:WORDS. Also can more context be given regarding this? I assume he is saying it as criticism of the song but I'm not 100% sure.
  • Do you think it might be beneficial to explicitly state that it was not released as a single? Also considering the amount of coverage the song generated, is there any coverage of the fact that it wasn't chosen as a single?
  • I do not think that it is necessary, as it should be clear that it is not a single. I do not believe there is any coverage on why it was not released as a single. I do not believe that anyone believed that it would be a single, and the amount of coverage was more so based on the weird take on the content. Aoba47 (talk) 03:23, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Great work as always. Freikorp (talk) 01:55, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]