From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.China Wikipedia:WikiProject China Template:WikiProject China China-related Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale .
I have moved the main title of this wiki to the "Doubting Antiquity School," rather than under the awkward pinyin of "Yigupai." For example, no one in English refers to the New Culture Movement in its pinyin form.
Also, I do not know how useful the long list of minor actors in the school/movement is, but somehow compacting it (by formatting or otherwise) would be probably help the article. TheSlowLife (talk ) 07:20, 28 January 2009 (UTC) [ reply ]
The deciphering of the Oracle bone script dealt a major blow against the Yigupai (Doubting Antiquity School), since the Oracle bones mostly agree with what the Shiji said about the Shang dynasty.
http://books.google.com/books?id=ERnrQq0bsPYC&pg=PA389&dq=Oracle+bone+script&hl=en&sa=X&ei=-5fRUpfXN4ugsQScpoCIDQ&ved=0CDkQ6wEwAA#v=onepage&q=Oracle%20bone%20script&f=false
http://www.lib.cam.ac.uk/mulu/oracle.html
06:01, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
other anti Yigupai evidence[ edit ]
Title Early Chinese Religion: Part One: Shang Through Han (1250 BC-220 AD) (2 Vols)
Early Chinese Religion
Editors John Lagerwey, Marc Kalinowski
Publisher BRILL, 2008
ISBN 9004168354 , 9789004168350
http://books.google.com/books?id=Idhyr1hqS0kC&pg=PA48#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=Idhyr1hqS0kC&pg=PA48&dq=I+have+already+raised+some+issues+connected+to+the+interpretation+of+archaeologically+recovered+evidence+through+the+lens+of+later+sources;+scholarship+of+the+past+decade+has+focused+on+a+specific+aspect+of+that+relationship,+pertaining+to+the+dating+of+received+texts+used+in+such+interpretations.+In+this+regard,+the+dominant+position+in+the+early+China+field+from+the+second+quarter+of+the+20th+century+was+occupied+by+a+school+of+thought+known+as+yigu+or+“doubting+antiquity,”+characterizing+a+skeptical+view+holding+that+most+received+accounts+of+the+distant+past+were+in+fact+post-Qin+fabrications+or+deliberate+distortions,+serving+vari-+ous+interests+of+their+authors+or+of+the+imperial+state.19+In+recent+decades,+accelerating+during+the+1990s+and+the+current+decade,+archaeologists+have+found+in+pre-imperial+tombs+dated+as+early+as+the+4th+century+BC+caches+of+texts+that+match+received+versions+that+the+yigu+approach+had+maintained+to+be+of+much+later+date.+The+cumulative+force+of+these+discoveries+has+been+to+raise+the+credibility+of+attempts+to+interpret+archaeologically+recovered+evidence+in+terms+of+the+historical+outlines+drawn+in+received+texts.+The+1995+publication+by+Li+Xueqin—perhaps+the+most+influential+scholar+of+early+China+in+the+People’s+Republic+of+China—of+the+book+Zouchu+yigu+shidai+,+or+“coming+out+from+the+era+of+doubting+antiquity,”+signaled+that+the+skeptical+methodology+of+mid-20th+century+scholarship+was+no+longer+a+dominant+trend+in+China.20&hl=en&sa=X&ei=X001VPygJ5DLsASq6YGABg&ved=0CB4Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=I%20have%20already%20raised%20some%20issues%20connected%20to%20the%20interpretation%20of%20archaeologically%20recovered%20evidence%20through%20the%20lens%20of%20later%20sources%3B%20scholarship%20of%20the%20past%20decade%20has%20focused%20on%20a%20specific%20aspect%20of%20that%20relationship%2C%20pertaining%20to%20the%20dating%20of%20received%20texts%20used%20in%20such%20interpretations.%20In%20this%20regard%2C%20the%20dominant%20position%20in%20the%20early%20China%20field%20from%20the%20second%20quarter%20of%20the%2020th%20century%20was%20occupied%20by%20a%20school%20of%20thought%20known%20as%20yigu%20or%20“doubting%20antiquity%2C”%20characterizing%20a%20skeptical%20view%20holding%20that%20most%20received%20accounts%20of%20the%20distant%20past%20were%20in%20fact%20post-Qin%20fabrications%20or%20deliberate%20distortions%2C%20serving%20vari-%20ous%20interests%20of%20their%20authors%20or%20of%20the%20imperial%20state.19%20In%20recent%20decades%2C%20accelerating%20during%20the%201990s%20and%20the%20current%20decade%2C%20archaeologists%20have%20found%20in%20pre-imperial%20tombs%20dated%20as%20early%20as%20the%204th%20century%20BC%20caches%20of%20texts%20that%20match%20received%20versions%20that%20the%20yigu%20approach%20had%20maintained%20to%20be%20of%20much%20later%20date.%20The%20cumulative%20force%20of%20these%20discoveries%20has%20been%20to%20raise%20the%20credibility%20of%20attempts%20to%20interpret%20archaeologically%20recovered%20evidence%20in%20terms%20of%20the%20historical%20outlines%20drawn%20in%20received%20texts.%20The%201995%20publication%20by%20Li%20Xueqin—perhaps%20the%20most%20influential%20scholar%20of%20early%20China%20in%20the%20People’s%20Republic%20of%20China—of%20the%20book%20Zouchu%20yigu%20shidai%20%2C%20or%20“coming%20out%20from%20the%20era%20of%20doubting%20antiquity%2C”%20signaled%20that%20the%20skeptical%20methodology%20of%20mid-20th%20century%20scholarship%20was%20no%20longer%20a%20dominant%20trend%20in%20China.20&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=Idhyr1hqS0kC&pg=PA48&dq=19+Leading+names+associated+with+the+rise+of+this+view+are+Gu+Jiegang++in+China+and+Bernhard+Karlgren+in+the+West.+20+Li+Xueqin,+Zouchu+yigu+shidai(Shenyang,+1995).+Li’s+book+is+basically+a+collection+of+previously+published+studies,+but+the+lead+essay,+which+shares+the+title+of+the+book,+constitutes+a+manifesto+rejecting+as+passé+the+methodologies+of+the+yigu+approach.+This+paradigm+shift,+if+it+may+be+so+termed,+has+had+varying+impact+outside+of+China,+and+some+scholars+in+the+West+remain+wary+of+correlations+between+archaeological+evidence+and+the+testimony+of+received+texts.+For+a+pronounced+example,+see+Robert+Bagley,+“Shang+archaeology,”+in+Cambridge+history,+pp.+124–231.+In+practice,+the+discipline+and+persuasiveness+of+such+correlations+must+be+assessed+individually,+based+on+rigor+of+argumentation+and+the+degree+to+which+claims+are+asserted+with+certainty+matching+the+strength+of+evidence+presented.+However,+researchers+trained+in+the+yigu+approach,+of+which+I+am+one,+can+no+longer+dismiss+the+evidence+of+received+texts+on+the+basis+of+a+presumed+late+date+of+composition.&hl=en&sa=X&ei=pE01VNHzL6bksASlxYGYBg&ved=0CCAQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=19%20Leading%20names%20associated%20with%20the%20rise%20of%20this%20view%20are%20Gu%20Jiegang%20%20in%20China%20and%20Bernhard%20Karlgren%20in%20the%20West.%2020%20Li%20Xueqin%2C%20Zouchu%20yigu%20shidai(Shenyang%2C%201995).%20Li’s%20book%20is%20basically%20a%20collection%20of%20previously%20published%20studies%2C%20but%20the%20lead%20essay%2C%20which%20shares%20the%20title%20of%20the%20book%2C%20constitutes%20a%20manifesto%20rejecting%20as%20passé%20the%20methodologies%20of%20the%20yigu%20approach.%20This%20paradigm%20shift%2C%20if%20it%20may%20be%20so%20termed%2C%20has%20had%20varying%20impact%20outside%20of%20China%2C%20and%20some%20scholars%20in%20the%20West%20remain%20wary%20of%20correlations%20between%20archaeological%20evidence%20and%20the%20testimony%20of%20received%20texts.%20For%20a%20pronounced%20example%2C%20see%20Robert%20Bagley%2C%20“Shang%20archaeology%2C”%20in%20Cambridge%20history%2C%20pp.%20124–231.%20In%20practice%2C%20the%20discipline%20and%20persuasiveness%20of%20such%20correlations%20must%20be%20assessed%20individually%2C%20based%20on%20rigor%20of%20argumentation%20and%20the%20degree%20to%20which%20claims%20are%20asserted%20with%20certainty%20matching%20the%20strength%20of%20evidence%20presented.%20However%2C%20researchers%20trained%20in%20the%20yigu%20approach%2C%20of%20which%20I%20am%20one%2C%20can%20no%20longer%20dismiss%20the%20evidence%20of%20received%20texts%20on%20the%20basis%20of%20a%20presumed%20late%20date%20of%20composition.&f=false
This article describes Liang Qichao as both a major critic of the Doubting Antiquity School and also a "prominent figure" within the movement. Well, which was he?
This should be corrected to explain clearly his position.
Philologick (talk ) 07:44, 6 June 2022 (UTC) [ reply ]