Talk:Dolphins (cricket team)

‹ The template below (WikiProject Cricket) is being considered for merging. See templates for discussion to help reach a consensus. ›

Cricket Mid‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Cricket To-do list:

Article assessment

Check Category:Unassessed cricket articles for class and Category:Unknown-importance cricket articles for importance: see Assessment Department for details

Verifiability

Update fair and unfair play, fast bowling, first-class cricket, googly, innings, leg break, limited overs cricket, not out, Pakistan Cricket Board, spin bowling, underarm bowling, wicket, and other fundamental articles classified by the WikiProject as high-importance so that they meet WP:Verifiability policy standards

Cleanup

There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)

Infoboxes

Add infoboxes to the player articles found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/requested infoboxes

Cricket people

Create articles about 19th century players who are listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/19th century players
Create biographies about Bangladeshi players from the task force redlink list
Check the listing of key bios at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Key biographies and improve these to at least B-class.
Create batting/bowling graphs for cricketers who have excelled in international cricket.
Create articles for redlinks present here and here

Cricket teams & countries

Domestic cricket coverage is needed for Bangladesh, Canada, Kenya, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe;
Create articles from redlinks and improve existing articles in List of current first-class cricket teams; National cricket teams; Under-19 national cricket teams
Create articles about cricket in these missing countries
Create or expand articles on international tours from items in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/summary of international tour articles
Create a link as such on Template:Cr-Aus/doc for Cricket Australia XI

Images

Add pictures (and remove template from address requests) in these Category:Wikipedia requested images of cricket people
Add pictures for grounds missing photos from here

On this day in cricket

Expand the anniversary coverage for Portal:Cricket at Portal:Cricket/Anniversaries

Umpires

Expand ICC International umpire panel; ICC Elite referee panel; ICC Associates and Affiliates umpire panel

Women

Expand Women's cricket, Women's Test cricket and articles about women's cricket generally especially biographies and tours

Update

A number of lists need to be updated, can be found in Template:International cricketers and Template:National cricket captains
Regularly updating cricketers' career stats.

Other

Export all cricket terms present in List of cricket terms to Wiktionary

South Africa Low‑importance

	South Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 11 March 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: consensus not to move the pages at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 06:30, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

– The brackets are pointless, people will search for Dolphins cricket team, not Dolphins (cricket team). Joseph2302 (talk) 12:32, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose and speedy close not the name, not our format In ictu oculi (talk) 18:20, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I think the brackets are better. They seem to fit better with WP:ATDAB and we have redirects to help anyone who does try searching for "Name cricket team" Spike 'em (talk) 18:42, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Some relevant points from WP:AT :

WP:UCRN would immediately suggest "Dolphins" as the article name, but as that is too general a name some disambiguation is needed.

Redirects exist for a reason : "Article titles and redirects should anticipate what readers will type as a first guess and balance that with what readers expect to be taken to."

If you can find English language articles that refer to "Dolphins cricket team" then you'd have a case as that being the natural disambiguation, otherwise it will fall into parenthetical disambiguation, as seems to be the case.

There is a Wikipedia:Naming conventions (sports teams) but it does not give any direct guidance on this situation, though on the talk page the editors seem to favour a bracketed sport name where needed. Spike 'em (talk) 09:16, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Accept The user who requested the page move made a good point on this stuff. People generally attempt for a Google search to get information about Dolphins, a domestic South African cricket team as Dolphins cricket team rather than typing as Dolphins (cricket team). Abishe (talk) 10:52, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Could either of you actually back this up with some proof, and explain why the redirect is not sufficient? Spike 'em (talk) 11:38, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I just did a google search for "Dolphins cricket team" and the 3rd page was this one (after 2 pages on the Dolphins own website). I did same search on wikipedia and it took me straight here. Please set your arguments out in terms of Wikipedia policies, not some vague notion of what you think is best. Spike 'em (talk) 11:42, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose the Dolphins do not call themselves "Dolphins cricket team", just "Dolphins". This is not the proper use of WP:NATURAL._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 17:11, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - This nomination is founded on faulty logic. This is like saying Highlanders (rugby union) should be at Highlanders rugby union team. – Pee Jay 15:30, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Which I think they should be, for the same reason. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:37, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to create a new naming convention for all sports, then discuss it at the page linked above and park this discussion until it is resolved. Spike 'em (talk) 13:18, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Not their names and redirects will take people nicely to the appropriate page titles. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 15:06, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose and comment I previously called the move a positive one but I made a mistake in understanding the wording. Abishe (talk) 15:27, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.