Jump to content

Talk:Doc Hastings

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

A user from Special:Contributions/24.19.203.160 added this edit that states Hastings was

Listed by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) as one of the 22 most corrupt members of congress for having improper contact with a Washington U.S. Attorney CREW List.

Someone interested and knowledgeable about this issue should check to see whether this is a noteworthy allegation and perhaps find a better way to present it in the article (A controversy section, perhaps?). As is, it seems like an attempt to slip some "this politician is corrupt" propaganda (however true it may be) into the encyclopedia.WDavis1911 08:17, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

US Chamber rating

[edit]

Here's the sentence I removed: "Hastings is one of the most pro-business pro-jobs representatives in the Congress, according to the United States Chamber of Commerce which gives Hastings a score of 94 out of 100 based on his 16-year voting record.". I think the Chamber's rating has a place, but it's not neutral to call it "pro-business pro-jobs", since that accepts the CoC's frame, namely that the policies they support create jobs. How about this: "Hastings is rated as one of the most business-friendly representatives in Congress, receiving a 94 out of 100 from the United States Chamber of Commerce." Meelar (talk) 01:03, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Meelar, that change seems fine. You seem to accept a frame that it's even possible to be pro-business but job destroying. More than 96% of U.S. Chamber members are small businesses with 100 employees or fewer. It's clear that the U.S. Chamber wants those companies to grow and be successful. Businesses are always categorized by the U.S. Chamber by the companies' headcounts, not their top line, bottom line, or input to the GDP. Senor Island (talk) 01:25, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template

[edit]

I'm now working to get Hastings into this Congressional Template.Senor Island (talk) 15:42, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Lead
  • Early life/upbringing
  • Early career (pre-politics or local politics, including other elected offices)
  • Political Campaigns
  • U.S. Representative career (or other office)
    • Current Committee Assignments
    • Past Committee Assignments, especially chairmanships or leadership positions
    • Caucus Memberships
    • Major Legislation
    • Controversies
  • Political Views (which should include at least 3 good quotes)
    • Interest Group Ratings
  • Personal life
  • Electoral history (table format)
  • See also
  • References
  • External Links

"Controversies"

[edit]

Why is this section in quotation marks? Is it an attempt at sarcasm? Most politicians' pages list Controversies as a neutral, fact-based section. This section reads more like a brag list, naming off all the corrupt Democrats Hastings has busted while denying any connection to Tom DeLay or any Republican misdeeds. It's obviously partisan and needs to be corrected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jpw5x4 (talk • contribs) 10:17, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

POV, speculative text, unsourced text rv

[edit]

Rva s above today. Quis separabit? 23:38, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Doc Hastings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:33, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Doc Hastings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:44, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Doc_Hastings&oldid=1263649724"