A fact from Die Himmel rühmen des Ewigen Ehre appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 February 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christian music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christian music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Christian musicWikipedia:WikiProject Christian musicTemplate:WikiProject Christian musicChristian music
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music
I like copy-edit-help but am not happy with lieder (songs). It looks like a translation, but isn't. All lieder are songs, but not all songs are lieder, only art songs in German. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:04, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest to stick to simply lieder. We do have readers who know what that is - apparently it's now an English word - and we have others who can click to find out. Why add clumsy four words to an already complex sentence? I would if we hadn't a link. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:48, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
To avoid the abrupt change to "song" later, without explanation. (Please stop referring to things like this as "clumsy". That is extremely negative.) Jmar67 (talk) 12:07, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Who wouldn't know that a composition for voice and piano is a song? - Sorry about the wrong word. What would you use as an adjective for six syllables holding up the flow of the sentence, in the lead of all places? I might be less disturbed in the body. Is that again the wrong word? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:42, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I likely would have said "cumbersome". You also might have meant "wordy", "unnecessary", "superfluous", "redundant", or that it "interrupts the flow". "Clumsy" tends to attack the editor who wrote it. At least I took offense. Jmar67 (talk) 23:16, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry, no offense was intended, and thank you for the alternatives. None of the adjectives works. "six additional syllables interrupting the flow" would be precise, but also awfully many syllables. In German, I might have said "umständlich" or "überdeutlich". In any case, I meant no judgement of the writer, only of the phrase. Bedtime. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:22, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
