Talk:Der Herr denket an uns, BWV 196/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Yash! (talk · contribs) 19:37, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
I will get around it ASAP. Yash! 19:37, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
In the meantime, can we have a section on "Selected recordings", like there is at other articles? Yash! 19:39, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
- I've expanded it. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:07, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
- I've formatted in the usual way. I have a problem to find the two required page numbers. Will try to find substitute sources. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:41, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Lead
[edit]- "has been suggested" - suggested by?
- "worked" - better if we can add what he worked as.
- "Scholars have suggested as a possible occasion the wedding of..." - missing something? Can be better phrased.
History and words
[edit]- Ref for the last two sentences?
Music
[edit]- Any relevant link for "processional music"?
- "return later" - for? If for the closing section, mention it.
- "which is also appears" -> "which also appears"
References
[edit]- As stated by Gerda Arendt.
That should do it. My apologies for the delay in reviewing. Yash! 12:05, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- I've addressed all of these. Thanks, Nikkimaria (talk) 12:59, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- Good work! Passing it. Yash! 18:55, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- Something that I missed previously: there isn't an appropriate explanation for "considered to be an early work on stylistic grounds" in the prose. Though I have passed it, I would appreciate if somebody got around it. Best, Yash! 19:02, 20 March 2016 (UTC)