This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Retailing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of retailing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RetailingWikipedia:WikiProject RetailingTemplate:WikiProject RetailingRetailing
I reverted the article to a previous version due to the obvious copyright infringement by 206.231.101.2 and by
Brokentuskk. It is back to its original stubby size, however, the entire article was a copy from D & DL's website. Tingalex20:29, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As Brokentuskk was a Dean & DeLuca marketing employee, the infringement isn't so obvious. Perhaps a quick email next time.
And how would anyone here know he's an employee? --Fredrick day 14:50, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
it doesn't matter wether or not he is or was a marketing employee, it is copyvio material, and therefor it's removal is correct. Martijn Hoekstra14:57, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I just restored the fiction section, which was removed in 2008 see here . I do think this is and E part of the D&D history since it D&D represents a lifestyle, which is used in film and TV. -- Mdd (talk) 11:10, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is that there's no context. My understanding is that Dead & DeLuca is posh - the American equivalent of Marks & Spencers, but moreso - but nothing in the text supports this. And the "popular culture" entries are useless because instead of discussing the store's context, they just point out that it appeared briefly in the background of an old episode of a long-forgotten sitcom. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 11:49, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Joel Dean. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 14#Joel Dean until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 19:25, 14 December 2021 (UTC)