Talk:Dead Man's Curve

This article was nominated for deletion on 5 August 2015. The result of the discussion was keep.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dead Man's Curve article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

United States: Ohio Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio (assessed as Low-importance).

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contradiction

There is now a seeming contradiction on the "Dead Man's Curve" article.

"The advisory speed is 35 miles per hour (60 kilometers per hour), although the legal speed limit is 50 mph (80 km/h) as on adjacent sections of the Shoreway and Innerbelt."

"In 1965, the state lowered the speed limit from 50 mph to 35 mph."

I created the first quotation, basing it on personal observations, partially backed up at my website at http://www.roadfan.com/dtclev.html#dm (which is one of the external links listed at the bottom of the article). The conditions which I describe are still extant as of January 27, 2006 (three days ago as I write this). I believe that the confusion stems from the fact that speeds on advisory speed signs (see http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/HTM/2003r1/part2/part2c.htm#section2C46 are not the true legal speed limit, as I understand it, so whatever the last actual black-characters-on-white-background speed limit sign read is what the speed limit is. (See http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/HTM/2003r1/part2/part2b1.htm#section2B13 ) In this case, there are "SPEED LIMIT 50" signs in both directions prior to Dead Man's Curve, and all the 35 mph indications are on yellow fields on the overhead signs, or advisory speeds.

As for the second quote (pre-existing), I have no way to challenge this as I was not even born in 1965 much less in the area. I would assume that the advisory vs. compulsory issue is there, but not being around at the time, I can't deny that the state might have actually installed regulatory black-on-white "SPEED LIMIT 35" signs, then replaced them with "SPEED LIMIT 50" signs by the time that I saw the signage for the first time.

As such, I am leaving the page as is, with the apparent contradiction. 198.30.228.3 22:28, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The second quote is from the Plain Dealer article. This ODOT PDF (see page 7) seems to indicate that the speed limit is 50, not 35. -- Mwalcoff 23:25, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Schuylkill

Here's another nasty bend in the "Sure-Kill." Google Maps

This curve is not renowned for being particularly dangerous; all of the Schuylkill from PA 291 to the river, including this curve is signed for 45 MPH.

Honestly this article is a mess, I've lived in and around Philadelphia all my life and I can assure that no part of the Schuylkill is referred to as a "dead-man's curve." (The one infamous "curve", the Conshohocken Curve, is a long, gradual bend infamous for backups due to sun glare, not accidents.) Krimpet 18:17, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Death Assessment Commentary

This article has potential, as the expression is valid in American culture, but needs an overhaul. The most glaring problmes are:

Undue emphasis on the Dead Man's Curve in Ohio without explanation.
Lack of references.
No mention of the history of the term.
One involved editor admits to Original Research in the above comments.

Boneyard90 (talk) 18:33, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Improvements needed

This article is completely US-centric, but needs more-global coverage since similar road hazards exist around the world. Also, this article needs overview coverage of topics such as common methods of reducing or bypassing the hazards, and perhaps mention of historic situations. The term appears often in popular culture, including pop and folk songs, as well. Reify-tech (talk) 21:29, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There are "similiar road hazards" worldwide, but the key should be whether they were locally and popularly referred by the label "Dead Man's Curve". This article should be limited to such road hazards as received the nickname "Dead Man's Curve" in popular lore or local news accounts, and it does appear to be a US origin term due to the American love and death affair with the automobile. -- Naaman Brown (talk) 04:23, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Parallel article, "Hairpin turn"

A parallel article, Hairpin turn, has developed independently, but with a more world-wide scope. However, instead of merging, I propose a different resolution of the overlap. See Talk:Hairpin turn#Parallel article, "Dead Man's Curve" for details and any discussion. Reify-tech (talk) 19:51, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is a dead man's curve in New Hampshire

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinkham_Notch

I don't have the time or interest to add it, but I was looking at the article and noticed that the one in my area is not on here. Maybe it's not qualified, I don't know. I figured I would share.

I think this is the correct place to put this.

74.220.232.50 (talk) 19:36, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dead Man's Curve. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120824140405/http://www.hauntedhawaii.net:80/ghost_hunting___3.170.html to http://www.hauntedhawaii.net/ghost_hunting___3.170.html#Ghost%20Hunting%20-%203

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:35, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rename to "List of" ?

This article is a laundry list of places nicknamed 'deadman's curve'. And that's probably all it will ever be. Instead of flagging it with MOS:LIST we could just call it what it is and be done with it. E.g. List of sites called Dead Man's Curve. Could take it one step further, merge it with Slaughter alley and call it List of road accident spots. --Cornellier (talk) 23:08, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think we need to rename it. It's about a concept and has some sourced examples (including one that's the subject of a pop song) that help to illustrate that concept. I wouldn't merge the two articles together as proposed because they're different concepts, although somewhat related. Imzadi 1979 → 23:39, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]