Talk:Dar al-Kiswa/GA1

GA Review

Passed Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 14:42, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kavyansh.Singh (talk · contribs) 20:02, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator: MartinPoulter (talk · contribs) at 13:51, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Comments

Prose

Maybe mention "Cairo, Egypt" in the lead Done
"including the kiswa, — " Our article calls it Kiswah with a 'h'. Done
"At its peak," — do we know which year? Done
Link 'Kaaba' in the prose. Done
"plus coverings" — 'and'? Done
"employing 4,000 craftsmen" — exactly or approximately? Done
"At this point, it was" — "It was then" Done
" the Sultan of Brunei" — s should be in lowercase per MOS:JOBTITLE Done
All images look fine. Suggesting to add ALT text Done
References fine.

Spot check

Spot checked Ref#3, 10, 7, and other online sources. No issues noted. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:42, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

General discussion

Hi! I'll review this article as a part of the June 2022 backlog drive. Feel free to let me know if you have any questions or need clarification for any point. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 19:56, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extremely sorry for the delay ... doing this now. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:15, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for this review- very useful input. I've made some minor changes (marked above) and will continue to work on improvements. MartinPoulter (talk) 16:40, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kavyansh.Singh: all requested changes have been made. MartinPoulter (talk) 10:14, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.