Talk:Daoud ibn al-Adid

Daoud ibn al-Adid has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 10, 2023. (Reviewed version).

Biography: Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (assessed as Low-importance).

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Islam: Muslim history / Shi'a Islam Low‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Muslim history task force.
	This article is supported by the Shi'a Islam task force.

Egypt Low‑importance

	Egypt portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Daoud ibn al-Adid appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 January 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Da'ud, the heir apparent of the last Fatimid caliph, spent almost his entire life imprisoned by the succeeding Ayyubid dynasty?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2022/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Da'ud ibn al-Adid.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 22:46, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Da'ud, the heir-apparent of the last Fatimid caliph, spent almost his entire life imprisoned by the successor Ayyubid dynasty? Source: Daftary, p.253: 'Al-Adid had appointed his eldest son, Da'ud, as his heir apparent....He, like other members of the Fatimid family, was detained as a prisoner by the Ayyubids.' & p. 254: 'The real Da'ud b. al-Adid died as a prisoner in Cairo in 604/1207–1208, during the reign of the fourth Ayyubid sultan al-Malik al-Adil.'
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Assisted migration of forests in North America

Created by Cplakidas (talk). Self-nominated at 19:59, 19 January 2022 (UTC).[reply]

New enough and long enough. QPQ present. Must AGF on the offline sourcing. His age is unclear, but it's clear he was prisoner a long time from the text and the fragments you shared of the source. No textual issues. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 18:34, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling

I have been wondering of the strange spelling for داود in English and found some books transcribing it with an apostrophe-like symbol, but also with the expected spelling Dawud, and Daoud on the German Wikipedia.

The other name is apparently الحامد لله, not what I saw here, الحميد الله "al-Ḥamīd Allah".

@Cplakidas: Should I respell the article? Daoud or Dawud (also Dāwūd) are better and more expectable transcriptions for the Arabic name, as they don't falsely suggest a glottal stop. --Mahmudmasri (talk) 15:05, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Mahmudmasri: I also wondered at the spelling, TBH, and on reflection, I tend to agree with you. If you want to respell the article, go ahead! Thanks a lot for checking this! Constantine ✍ 16:14, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, and it's such an interesting topic I didn't know about. Thanks for writing about it. --Mahmudmasri (talk) 16:41, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Daoud ibn al-Adid/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: AhmadLX (talk · contribs) 23:22, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this over the next few days. --AhmadLX-(Wikiposta) 23:22, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lead is too short.
al-Ḥāmid li'llāh and al-Ḥāmid li-'llāh
No diacritics per MOS (walī al-ʿahd -> wali al-ahd etc.)
'Hidden Imam' should link to Occultation
Briefly introduce Qadi al-Fadil, Baha al-Din Qaraqush

A nice little article. I would have preferred some more detail, but given the dearth of info in the sources (I checked some of them), I think I can compromise on broadness. AhmadLX-(Wikiposta) 22:30, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AhmadLX, thanks for taking the time to review this. I think I've addressed your points. Anything else? Constantine ✍ 13:00, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No that was all from me, and this is a Pass. Nice work. AhmadLX-(Wikiposta) 22:38, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed