Jump to content

Talk:Daniel W. Nebert

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contested deletion

[edit]

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... Dr Nebert is a well known geneticist. He has authorized me to create this Wikipedia page on his behalf. Please do not delete it

@Glyphds: this article looks liked its copied from another site and this article has no references. --___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 21:45, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

[edit]

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... Dr Nebert provided me with a word document so the formatting is a little off. I'm fixing it now and adding citations. Please do not delete this page. The content is directly from Dr Nebert. It was not copied from another site. Thanks. Glyphds (talk) 21:58, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Conflict of Interest

[edit]

I think you'll agree that it's written from a neutral perspective. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Glyphds (talkcontribs) 23:03, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of conflict of interest message

[edit]

Information to be added or removed: Requesting review of the article now that it's done, and removal of CoI message Explanation of issue: Upon review it should be apparent that the article is written from a neutral perspective.

Glyphds (talk) 19:39, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

[edit]

This page should not be speedily deleted because... We've already been through this. Dr Nebert is a well known geneticist and the content here is meticulously sourced. There is no reason to delete the page. Perhaps this request to delete is personally motivated? --Glyphds (talk) 21:07, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

COI "Awards" listings

[edit]

Dear TJMSmith: Thank you for applying this edit of yours! If any COI editor ever tries to add a spammy "Awards" section back to the article, feel free to use WP:ORGAWARDS as your justification for cutting it down to size. Kind regards, —Unforgettableid (talk) 11:55, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up! TJMSmith (talk) 12:47, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Restoring "Selected publication" section and asking for the addition of content in Award section

[edit]

Greetings all. I am a new editor. A senior editor, Russ Woodroofe reverted my edits. We discussed the matter here, after which I am restoring the "Selected Publication" section.

As per our discussion, I would have to ask here, on the talk page, about any additions to the "Awards" section. I did the following edits... I seek your expert advice:

Awards and recognition

1986 - Bernard B Brodie Award in Drug Metabolism and Disposition[https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7995936/]

1994 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) [3][https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/doi/pdf/10.1289/ehp.103-1519088]

2005 - Distinguished Lifetime Toxicology Scholar. [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7995936/]

2016 - R.T. Williams Distinguished Scientific Achievement Award. [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7995936/]

2024 - Research.com Genetics in United States Leader Award[https://research.com/u/daniel-w-nebert]


Please let me know if they are okay. If they are not, kindly let me know the reason so I can better understand. Thank you. Bo2pup (talk) 23:42, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A short selected publications list is supportable, but 7 papers seems like way too many to me. I trimmed to three. If there is a good reason to add a less highly cited paper, then I'd be happy to discuss. The awards mostly (all?) look below the level that I think an encyclopedia should cover, and I think that the prose coverage is better than a list. It is possible that the Toxicology Scholar award would be worthwhile, though we should look for better sourcing than an interview. Pinging @Unforgettableid and TJMSmith: who did some needed trimming of paid editing of this article. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 16:25, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]