This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArtsWikipedia:WikiProject ArtsTemplate:WikiProject ArtsWikiProject Arts
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts
Dear Onel5969, since I have been for a response from you to what I replied to your notice on my talk page I am taking another try here: again, let me first assure you that I truly appreciate your commitment to quality control, many thanks indeed. However, with all due respect, it appears that your notice to me is a non-specific copy-paste template. Obviously, verifiability cannot be a real issue given the quantity and quality of references, neither notability for the very same reason. Regarding your suspicion of a paid edit forgive me that as an experienced editor I really take that as an insult. You could have at least elaborated on that point. Some weeks ago another editor explained to me that from his experience it was the fact that I was both the editor of an article and the author of the featured photos hinted towards a paid edit, so I could at least gather why he had that suspicion. My response then was as it is now: for me personally it is very demotivating to write an article which I cannot illustrate with images, which is why I then often take them myself. To make it very clear: I have had no material benefit from this edit whatsoever and am not going to have it. I simply went to the vernissage of Hellmann, whom I saw for the last time some seven years ago, and was so impressed by his works that I am on the best way to become vegan myself. And I was surprised that there was no WP article on him yet given his prominence - especially in Switzerland, but also beyond - and hence changed that. So, I must admit that yes: I am a fan but evidently not in any relationship which would constitute any COI. In addition, I would argue that the article is despite my fondness still written from a neutral point of view, as I merely let the sources speak for themselves. If you still insist on keeping the article in draft, please do provide specific reasons. Thank you & best regards RomanDeckert (talk) 13:39, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Sorry, I didn't see your ping when you responded on your talk page, not sure what happened. Okay, what you say makes sense, I'll move it back to mainspace. Onel5969TT me13:44, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
