Talk:Dan Slott

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Comics: Creators / United States Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related work groups:
/
	This article is supported by Comics creators work group.
	This article is supported by United States comics work group.

Sub-sections

While I agree with the recent text changes, I actually think the entry is too brief to merit so many sub-sections. Does anyone else agree (or disagree)? --Galliaz 01:17, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article Mini Wish-List

Does anybody know his birthdate or even have a photo of him? Also, is the person attending She-Hulk's trial in She-Hulk #100 and complaining about the continuity actually him? Because I was actually gonna scan it and upload it if it were the case... --Toquinha 02:16, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, that's John Byrne :) MultipleTom 14:19, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request to Add Article Link

Would anyone be opposed to my adding this a link to my article titled Boston Legal v. She-Hulk on the entry? It is an in depth study of Slott's work on She-Hulk. (http://www.silverbulletcomics.com/news/story.php?a=2353)

Please put this page under protection

This page has recently became the target of an internet flame war. Could somebody put it under protection? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.162.42.28 (talk) 03:04, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see any flames in the edit summaries in question, nor on the talk pages of any of the participants. There was indeed a series of edits that violated policies such as WP:V and WP:NOR, beginning with your edit here, but that material has since been removed, and I see no flames that were generated as a result of it. If however, that material continues to be added without a source, I will block those editors adding it, and protect the page. In the mean time, please do not blank the talk page of the IP you're editing from, and make sure to sign your posts. You can do this by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of them. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 14:25, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dan Slott. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080109205251/http://www.comixology.com/podcasts/13/Spider-Man-Brand-New-Day-with-Dan-Slott to http://www.comixology.com/podcasts/13/Spider-Man-Brand-New-Day-with-Dan-Slott

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:34, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]