Jump to content

Talk:Daguerreotype

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Daguerreotype. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:46, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Useful article on restoration+

[edit]

Phys.org Research team uncovers lost images from the 19th century June 22, 2018 by Jeff Renaud, University of Western Ontario

Smallbones(smalltalk) 14:15, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What was the role of Wollcott's mirror camera in early daguerreotype portraiture (eg in Beard's rooftop operation in the Regent Street Polytechnic?

[edit]

Why has Woolcott's camera disappeared from the article? RPSM (talk) 11:18, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What is the purpose of the redundant word "daguerreotype" in the first sentence?

[edit]

Did someone change a variant spelling to be the same as the initial version? Lexaxis7 (talk) 18:45, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Should the invention of photography be a separate article?

[edit]

This article is about Daguerreotype photography--which is a big subject in itself. But it wanders off into talking about the "Who invented photograph?" controversy. Whoever that was, it wasn't Louis Daguerre (as both Beaumont Newhall and Watson & Rappaport make clear). Mgryan (talk) 19:36, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spread

[edit]

Something missing from the discussion of the rapid spread of the technique is how. That is, were photographers learning the technique and themselves creating the plates, the cameras, etc., or were these made, sold, and distributed by companies?Bill (talk) 04:45, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Neshebra Danielle Wright

[edit]

Daguerreotype Daguerreotype Daguerreotype Daguerreotype Daguerreotype 2600:1005:B19B:578D:A169:1745:B93D:E2AB (talk) 00:03, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Daguerreotype

[edit]

cubiculum obscurum, cubiculum tenebricosum, conclave obscurum, and locus obscurus.Neshebra Danielle Wright Daguerreotype Daguerreotype Daguerreotype Daguerreotype Daguerreotype Neshebra Danielle Wright Neshebra Wright (talk) 00:22, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]