Talk:DF-ZF

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Aviation / Asian / Chinese Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Asian military history task force
	Chinese military history task force

China

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Aviation

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

Comments

There is no confirmation on the alleged failure of the Aug. 7 test. The sources from South China Morning Post, where ru is quoting from, are "two sources close to the military". So unnamed sources are now credible? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.62.189.174 (talk) 09:49, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is no proof the plan actually exists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.161.220.116 (talk) 01:56, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is Free Beacon's claim accurate? IIRC Russia is still trying to make Yu-71 work. China would be 1st or 2nd depending on whether you count the HTV-2's incomplete flights. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.183.131.140 (talk) 12:03, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Sources close to the military" is a journalistic and literary device to mean "the military"; yet the sources are highly placed enough to be thought knowledgeable, and who wish to remain unnamed. US intelligence does not confirm topics of interest to them. It is probably better to name the reporter in the citation. Nice try though. --Ancheta Wis (talk | contribs) 12:31, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image Update

There needs to be an image update for the HGV, given the recent military parade showcasing the DF-17 missiles. 42Grunt (talk) 06:03, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any American US defence department image or sketch that would be in the public domain? Macktheknifeau (talk) 04:23, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

Why is it using the aircraft infobox when it is supposed to use the weapons infobox like other missiles Thehistorianisaac (talk) 07:33, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]