Talk:Crownhill

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Devon Low‑importance

	Devon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge proposal plumer barracks into Crownhill

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was Don't Merge The plumer barracks article has been improved with sufficient sources. Tim Landy (talk) 12:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I propose merging Plumer Barracks into Crownhill there is no WP:sigcov of Plumer barracks but they are mentioned already in the Crownhill article so it can be merged there. Tim Landy (talk) 11:57, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have expanded the article quite a bit giving it quite a bit more coverage. Hopefully, this will enable you to withdraw the proposal. Dormskirk (talk) 12:52, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't Merge I agree the article is better now, good effort to get that done so quickly! I will still leave this discussion open for the 7 days in case others wish to comment. Tim Landy (talk) 15:17, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tim That's great. Many thanks, Dormskirk (talk) 15:33, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.